Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 3 minor 1 cited by

Counting monster potentials

T0 review · 4 major / 3 minor · reviewed 2026-08-27 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Up to a stated algebraic-branch conjecture, this paper shows that the number of monster potentials with N roots equals the integer-partition count p(N), matching the level-N dimension of quantum KdV.

desk verdict A genuinely new large-momentum asymptotic analysis of the BLZ system, with a partition classification that is unconditional at the level of Theorem 5.5; the advertised p(N) counting theorem is real but conditional on Conjecture 5.8 and should be labeled that way. read the letter →

arxiv 2009.14638 v2 pith:UW7GY6AK submitted 2020-09-29 math-ph hep-thmath.CAmath.MP

Riccardo Conti , Davide Masoero This is my paper · ORCID
classification math-phhep-thmath.CAmath.MP
keywords monsterpotentialsBLZsystemlargemomentumlimitODE/IMcorrespondencequantumKdVWronskiansofHermitepolynomialsrationalextensionsharmonicoscillatorintegerpartitions
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper studies the monster potentials of the BLZ system — a family of rational Schrödinger potentials whose spectral data are believed, through the ODE/IM correspondence, to describe excited states of the quantum KdV model. It establishes that in the large-momentum limit $L\to\infty$ the poles of every such potential condense at the complex equilibria of the ground-state potential, with the leading correction governed by the roots of a Wronskian of Hermite polynomials associated with an integer partition. This reduction lets the authors associate to each partition $\nu$ of $N$ a unique algebraic family of monster potentials with $N$ roots, and — assuming a technical conjecture on the solvability of a perturbed root system — prove that the total number of monster potentials with $N$ roots is exactly $p(N)$, the number of integer partitions of $N$. That count coincides with the dimension of the level-$N$ subspace of the quantum KdV vacuum module, so the paper turns the counting side of the ODE/IM correspondence into a concrete algebraic problem.

What carries the argument

The engine of the paper is the Wronskian-Hermite polynomial $P^{[\nu]}(t)=c_\nu\,\mathrm{Wr}[H_{\nu_j}(t),H_{\nu_{j-1}+1}(t),\ldots,H_{\nu_1+j-1}(t)]$, whose roots $v_k^{[\nu]}$ are precisely the poles of the rational extension $U^{[\nu]}(t)=t^2-2\frac{d^2}{dt^2}\log P^{[\nu]}(t)$ of the harmonic oscillator. Under the rescaling $z_k=\frac{L}{\alpha}\left(1+(2\alpha+2)^{-1/4}\varepsilon t_k\right)^{2\alpha+2}$ with $\varepsilon=L^{-1/4}$, the BLZ system is converted into the perturbed root equation $2t_k+3\varepsilon\kappa t_k^2-\sum_{j\neq k}\frac{4}{(t_k-t_j)^3}+O(\varepsilon^2)=0$, $\kappa=\frac{5-2\alpha}{3}(2\alpha+2)^{-1/4}$, whose $\varepsilon=0$ limit is the equation that characterises the roots of $P^{[\nu]}$. The counting theorem then rests on Conjecture 5.8: for every partition $\nu$ the perturbed system has exactly one algebraic solution branch starting from the roots of $P^{[\nu]}$. A second structural object is the monodromy identity $P^{[\nu]}(z;e^{2\pi i}L)=P^{[\nu^*]}(z;L)$, which pairs each branch with its conjugate partition and determines how the $p(N)$ sheets of the solution variety connect around $L=\infty$.

What would settle it

Solve the BLZ system numerically for $N=10$ at a large, generic $L$ (for instance $L=10^6$, $\alpha=\pi/3$): if the number of distinct solutions modulo permutations is not $p(10)=42$, the central counting claim is false. A sharper algebraic test is to run the order-by-order Puiseux construction for the completely degenerate partition $(4,3,2,1)$; if any coefficient equation has no solution or more than one, Conjecture 5.8 fails.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

Fix $N$ and $\alpha>0$. The central claim is that the set of monster potentials is organized by the $p(N)$ partitions of $N$: after the rescaling $z_k=\frac{L}{\alpha}\left(1+(2\alpha+2)^{-1/4}\varepsilon t_k\right)^{2\alpha+2}$, $\varepsilon=L^{-1/4}$, any sequence of solutions of the BLZ system with $L\to\infty$ splits into $p(N)$ possible regimes, one for each partition $\nu$, in which the rescaled roots $t_k$ converge to the roots $v_k^{[\nu]}$ of $P^{[\nu]}(t)=c_\nu\,\mathrm{Wr}[H_{\nu_j}(t),H_{\nu_{j-1}+1}(t),\ldots,H_{\nu_1+j-1}(t)]$, and the potential converges to the rational extension $U^{[\nu]}(t)=t^2-2\frac{d^2}{dt^2}\log P^{[\nu]}(t)$ of the harmonic oscillator. The BLZ equations themselves reduce, to leading order, to the perturbed system $2t_k+3\varepsilon\kappa t_k^2-\sum_{j\neq k}\frac{4}{(t_k-t_j)^3}+O(\varepsilon^2)=0$, whose $\varepsilon=0$ limit is exactly the root equation of $P^{[\nu]}$. Under Conjecture 5.8, each $\nu$ supports one unique algebraic branch $P^{[\nu]}(z;L)$ of solutions; the branches exhaust the variety, giving exactly $p(N)$ monster potentials for large $L$, at most $p(N)$ for all $L$, and exactly $p(N)$ for generic $L$. The paper also computes the bottom of the radial spectrum on each branch, $E_n^{[\nu]}=(1+\alpha)(L/\alpha)^{\alpha/(\alpha+1)}+(2\alpha+2)^{1/(2\alpha)}(\alpha+1)^{-1}(2(n-j)+1)L^{(\alpha-1)/(2\alpha+2)}+O(|L|^{-1/(\alpha+1)})$, matching the Fermi-sea hole prediction of the integrable model.

Load-bearing premise

The counting theorem collapses without Conjecture 5.8: for every partition $\nu$, the perturbed root equations must admit one and only one algebraic solution branch emerging from the roots of $P^{[\nu]}$ at $\varepsilon=0$.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Assuming Conjecture 5.8, for every $N$ and all sufficiently large $L$, the number of monster potentials with $N$ roots is exactly $p(N)$.
  • For every $L$, the number of higher-state potentials is at most $p(N)$, with equality for generic $L$.
  • Each large-momentum monster potential is labelled by a partition $\nu$; its $N$ poles lie at $L/\alpha+(2\alpha+2)^{3/4}\alpha^{-1}v_k^{[\nu]}L^{-3/4}+o(L^{-3/4})$.
  • The bottom of the radial spectrum of branch $\nu$ is explicitly asymptotic, real and positive for large positive $L$, and its level labels are obtained from the natural numbers by deleting $\nu_j,\nu_{j-1}+1,\ldots,\nu_1+j-1$ — the Fermi-sea hole structure.
  • For integer $M=2\alpha+2$, the same analysis describes $J$ particles with inverse-square interactions in the external field $x^{M-2}+L/x^2$: roots condense around the $M$ equilibria and split into $M$ weakly coupled subsystems labelled by $M$-partitions.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A proof of Conjecture 5.8 for the missing completely degenerate cases $d\ge 4$ would make the counting theorem unconditional for all $N$, and would describe the local structure of the $p(N)$-sheeted solution surface at infinity as a union of conjugate pairs $(\nu,\nu^*)$.
  • The conjectural formula $\det J^{[\nu]}=2^N\prod_k(\rho_k^{[\nu]})^2$ for the Jacobian spectrum suggests that invertibility in the non-degenerate case is purely combinatorial; if provable, it would remove the Jacobian hypothesis from Proposition 6.1 and might extend by continuity to degenerate strata.
  • The asymptotic spectrum formula gives a concrete target for a future proof of the full BLZ conjecture: one could compare it, order by order in $L^{-1/(\alpha+1)}$, with the large-momentum expansion of the Bethe Ansatz equations.
  • Because the reduction only uses the quadratic term of the ground-state Taylor expansion, the same condensation-and-Wronskian mechanism is likely to transfer to the opers of the generalised quantum $g$-KdV models, where the analogous system of algebraic equations is too complex to be handled directly.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Formalized claims in Lean

  1. Claim #1: Fix $N$ and $\alpha>0$. The central claim is that the set of monster potentials is organized by the $p(N)$ partitions of $N$: after the rescaling $z_k=\frac{L}{\alpha}\left(1+(2\alpha+2)^{-1/4}\varepsilon t_k\right)^{2\alpha+2}$, $\varepsilon=L^{-1/4}$, any sequence of solutions of the BLZ system with $L\to\infty$ splits into $p(N)$ possible regimes, one for each partition $\nu$, in which the resc

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Request a human review

A listed scientist reviews the paper for a fee and the review publishes here regardless of verdict. See the reviewers or get listed.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 3 minor

Summary. The paper studies the large-momentum (large-L) limit of the Bazhanov-Lukyanov-Zamolodchikov (BLZ) system defining monster potentials. It proves that, for any sequence of higher-state potentials with L going to infinity, the roots condense about the complex equilibria of the ground-state potential and admits an asymptotic expansion in terms of the roots of Wronskians of Hermite polynomials (Theorem 5.5). The leading correction is expressed through the partition-associated polynomials P^{[ν]}(t). The authors then construct, for each partition ν of N, a one-parameter algebraic family of solutions of the BLZ system and derive an asymptotic formula for the radial spectrum. The central counting claim—that the number of monster potentials with N roots equals the number p(N) of integer partitions of N for large L—is presented in Corollary 5.12 under the assumption of Conjecture 5.8, which asserts the existence and uniqueness of these algebraic families. Sections 6–8 provide partial verifications of this conjecture for non-degenerate partitions, completely degenerate cases with d=2,3, and partially degenerate cases, respectively, while the general case d>=4 (N>=10) remains open. The paper also extends the analysis to potentials of the form x^{M-2}+L/x^2 with trivial monodromy, and includes numerical tests for N=5,6.

Significance. If the conjectural ingredients were resolved, the paper's main result would constitute a substantial confirmation of the Weak BLZ conjecture in the large-momentum regime, establishing a precise link between integer partitions, Wronskians of Hermite polynomials, and the counting of monster potentials. The unconditional content—Theorem 5.5 and the derivation of the perturbative system (5.25), the explicit asymptotic expansion (5.18), and the spectral formula (5.23)—is carefully derived and represents a genuine contribution to the ODE/IM correspondence literature. The paper also provides nontrivial algebraic and numerical evidence, including explicit Puiseux expansions and a conjectural closed formula for the spectrum of the Jacobian J^{[ν]}. However, the advertised counting theorem is not proven as stated: it rests on Conjecture 5.8, which is unresolved for all N>=10 and is only partially verified for smaller N. The paper would be a solid contribution if reframed as a conditional proof plus a well-supported conjecture, with the unconditional results presented as the main theorems.

major comments (4)
  1. [Section 5.5, Corollary 5.12] The central counting result is conditional. The abstract and introduction state that the paper proves that the number of monster potentials with N roots equals p(N) 'up to a few mathematical technicalities', but Corollary 5.12 explicitly begins with 'Assume that Conjecture 5.8 holds'. Since Conjecture 5.8 is exactly the existence and uniqueness of the algebraic families needed to count solutions, the advertised theorem is not established. The manuscript should clearly distinguish the unconditional Theorem 5.5 from the conditional Corollary 5.12, and the abstract/introduction should be revised to avoid overclaiming.
  2. [Section 7, Remark 7.8 and Propositions 7.1, 7.7] Even for the completely degenerate cases d=2,3, the uniqueness required by Conjecture 5.9 is not fully proven. Remark 7.8 states explicitly that Propositions 7.1 and 7.7 prove existence and uniqueness only among algebraic solutions with the specific Puiseux expansion (7.1) or (7.25), not that every algebraic solution must have that expansion. Moreover, Proposition 7.7 is stated without proof ('we omit the proof because it is very long'). Thus the evidence for Conjecture 5.8 in these cases is incomplete, and the omitted proof must either be supplied or the statement marked as a conjecture.
  3. [Section 6, Conjecture 6.3 and Proposition 6.1] The non-degenerate case relies on the invertibility of the Jacobian J^{[ν]}, which the authors do not prove. Proposition 6.1 requires that J^{[ν]} be invertible, but this is only established through Conjecture 6.3, which asserts that the eigenvalues are 2(ρ_k^{[ν]})^2 and is verified numerically for N≤10. Without a proof of Conjecture 6.3, the non-degenerate case is also conditional. The paper should either prove the invertibility or explicitly state that the non-degenerate case is conditional on this conjecture.
  4. [Section 8, Proposition 8.1 and Remark 8.4] The partially degenerate case is proven only under unproven invertibility assumptions. Proposition 8.1 assumes that the matrices ~J^{[ν]}, A^{[ν]}, and the Schur complements appearing in the statement are invertible; Remark 8.4 provides only numerical evidence that this hypothesis is satisfied. Additionally, the text admits in Sections 1.2 and 5.5 that the case d≥4, i.e., N≥10, is completely open. These are not 'a few mathematical technicalities' but substantial unproven steps in the argument for the p(N) counting theorem. The manuscript should either prove these assumptions, or state clearly that the counting theorem is a conjecture for N≥10.
minor comments (3)
  1. [Section 10, Figures 1–4] The figures appear in the text only as sequences of star symbols; if this is a rendering issue in the submitted file, please ensure the actual plots are embedded, otherwise the numerical comparison between the perturbative and numerical solutions cannot be visually verified.
  2. [Section 5.3, equation (5.23)] The definition of the sequence N^{[ν]} is used before it is formally introduced; please define it explicitly when it first appears in the statement of the spectral asymptotics, not only in the later Section 3.
  3. [Section 12, Appendix] In the proof of Proposition 8.1, the vectors Y_i^\pm are used without restating their definition; adding a reference to equation (12.7) at the point of use would improve readability.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: the p(N) count is honestly conditional on an open conjecture, and the asymptotic derivation is parameter-free.

full rationale

The paper's central counting claim is explicitly and repeatedly stated to be conditional on Conjecture 5.8, which postulates, for every partition ν of N, the existence and uniqueness of an algebraic branch P^{[ν]}(t;ε) solving the rescaled BLZ system (5.25) with the prescribed leading term. Corollary 5.12 then derives the p(N) count from this conjecture together with the unconditional asymptotic Theorem 5.5. This is a conditional derivation, not a circular one: the target count p(N) is never fed into the equations, no parameter is fitted to the desired answer, and the asymptotic expansion (1.13)/(5.18) is parameter-free. The partition indexing comes from the independent Oblomkov classification of rational extensions of the harmonic oscillator via Wronskians of Hermite polynomials, not from the counting statement. The unresolved points—Conjecture 6.3 on the Jacobian spectrum, Remark 7.8 noting that uniqueness in the completely degenerate cases is only established within a fixed Puiseux ansatz, unproven matrix invertibility in Proposition 8.1, and the open d ≥ 4 cases—are gaps or incompleteness in the proof of Conjecture 5.8, not circular reductions. The cited prior work by the same authors (e.g., [26]) supplies technical lemmas about monodromy and opers, but these are not invoked as a substitute for the counting argument, and the main derivation does not reduce to a self-citation chain. Therefore no significant circularity is present.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No free parameters were fitted to data; α and L are external variables. The new algebraic families P^{[ν]}(z;L) are defined from existing Hermite-Wronskian data and the BLZ equations. The main caveats are several explicit conjectures, most importantly Conjecture 5.8, which is assumed rather than proved in full generality.

assumptions (6)
  • standard math Oblomkov's classification: rational extensions of the harmonic oscillator with trivial monodromy are exactly the Wronskians of Hermite polynomials P^{[ν]} associated to partitions ν.
    Invoked in Section 3, Theorem 3.1, to identify the limiting objects U^{[ν]} and to know there are p(N) of them.
  • domain assumption Felder-Hemery-Veselov F-property conjecture: every non-zero root of P^{[ν]} is simple.
    Assumed in Section 5.5 and Remark 5.13 to reduce all partitions to nondegenerate, completely degenerate, or partially degenerate cases; proven only for rectangular partitions.
  • ad hoc to paper Conjecture 5.8: for every partition ν there is a unique algebraic solution of the perturbed system (5.25) near ε=0 with limit P^{[ν]}.
    The load-bearing unproven premise for Corollary 5.12 and the p(N) counting result; proven only in restricted cases.
  • ad hoc to paper Conjecture 6.3: the eigenvalues of the Jacobian J^{[ν]} are 2(ρ_k^{[ν]})^2 for a combinatorial sequence ρ^{[ν]}.
    Used in Proposition 6.1 to ensure invertibility of the Jacobian in the nondegenerate case; numerically verified for N≤10 but not proven.
  • domain assumption Invertibility of the matrices ~J^{[ν]}, A^{[ν]}, and related block matrices in Proposition 8.1.
    Needed for existence and uniqueness in the partially degenerate case; supported only by numerical checks, not by proof.
  • standard math Artin approximation theorem: a unique formal solution of an algebraic system near a singular point gives a convergent algebraic solution.
    Used in the proofs of Propositions 7.1 and 8.1 to pass from formal Puiseux series to convergent algebraic solutions.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Counting monster potentials." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/UW7GY6AK

@misc{pith2026200914638,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Counting monster potentials},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/UW7GY6AK}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2009.14638}
}
abstract

We study the large momentum limit of the monster potentials of Bazhanov-Lukyanov-Zamolodchikov, which -- according to the ODE/IM correspondence -- should correspond to excited states of the Quantum KdV model. We prove that the poles of these potentials asymptotically condensate about the complex equilibria of the ground state potential, and we express the leading correction to such asymptotics in terms of the roots of Wronskians of Hermite polynomials. This allows us to associate to each partition of $N$ a unique monster potential with $N$ roots, of which we compute the spectrum. As a consequence, we prove -- up to a few mathematical technicalities -- that, fixed an integer $N$, the number of monster potentials with $N$ roots coincides with the number of integer partitions of $N$, which is the dimension of the level $N$ subspace of the quantum KdV model. In striking accordance with the ODE/IM correspondence.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2009.14638 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. On the left, the case of the degenerate partition (4, 1), and on the right the conjugate case (2, 1, 1, 1). In yellow the numer￾ical solution with L = 7 × 104 and α = π 3 , in blue the perturbative solution according to formula (10.2). The star is the point z = L α = 7π104 3 . 37 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p037_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. On the left, the case of the non-degenerate partition (5), and on the right the conjugate case (1, 1, 1, 1, 1). In yellow the numerical solution, in blue the perturbative solution according to formula (10.1). The star is the point z = L α = 7π104 3 . ★ ★ [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p038_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. On the left, the case of the non-degenerate partition (2, 2, 1), and on the right the conjugate case (3, 2). In yellow the numerical solution, in blue the perturbative solution according to formula (10.1). The star is the point z = L α = 7π104 3 . 38 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p038_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: On the left, the case of the non-degenerate self￾conjugate partition (3, 1, 1) of N = 5, and on the right the com￾pletely degenerate partition (3, 2, 1) of N = 6. In yellow the numer￾ical solution, in blue the perturbative solution according to formula (10.1) for the c…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. On W-algebras and ODE/IM correspondence

    hep-th 2025-08 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    The eigenvalues of quantum KdV-type charges in Virasoro, W3, and W4 algebras are computed from Bethe roots via WKB periods of Catalan curves, verified against direct CFT diagonalization.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

33 extracted references · 33 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    Properties of the zeros of the classical polynomials and of the bessel functions.Il Nuovo Cimento B (1971- 1996), 49(2):173–199, 1979

    S Ahmed, M Bruschi, F Calogero, MA Olshanetsky, and AM Perelomov. Properties of the zeros of the classical polynomials and of the bessel functions.Il Nuovo Cimento B (1971- 1996), 49(2):173–199, 1979

    work page 1971

  2. [2]

    Rational and elliptic solutions of the korteweg-de vries equation and a related many-body problem

    H Airault, HP McKean, and J Moser. Rational and elliptic solutions of the korteweg-de vries equation and a related many-body problem. Communications on Pure and Applied Mathematics, 30(1):95–148, 1977. 48

    work page 1977

  3. [3]

    M. Artin. Algebraic approximation of structures over complete local rings.Publications Math- ématiques de l’Institut des Hautes Études Scientifiques, 36(1):23–58, 1969

    work page 1969

  4. [4]

    Bazhanov, G

    V. Bazhanov, G. Kotousov, S. Koval, and S. Lukyanov. On the scaling behaviour of the alternating spin chain.Journal of High Energy Physics, 2019(8):87, 2019

    work page 2019

  5. [5]

    V. V. Bazhanov and S. Lukyanov. Integrable structure of quantum field theory: Classical flat connections versus quantum stationary states.Journal of High Energy Physics, 2014(9):1–69, 2014

    work page 2014

  6. [6]

    Bazhanov, S.L

    V.V. Bazhanov, S.L. Lukyanov, and A. B. Zamolodchikov. Spectral determinants for Schrodinger equation and Q operators of conformal field theory.J.Statist.Phys., 102:567– 576, 2001

    work page 2001

  7. [7]

    Lukyanov, and A.B

    V.V Bazhanov, S.L. Lukyanov, and A.B. Zamolodchikov. Higher-level eigenvalues of Q- operators and Schroedinger equation.Adv. Theor. Math. Phys., 7:711, 2004

    work page 2004

  8. [8]

    Bonneux, C

    N. Bonneux, C. Dunning, and M. Stevens. Coefficients of wronskian hermite polynomials. Studies in Applied Mathematics, 144(3):245–288, 2020

    work page 2020

Show all 33 references
  1. [9]

    N. Carr. The massive ODE/IM correspondence for simply-laced Lie algebras. PhD thesis, University of Kent, 2019

    2019

  2. [10]

    N. Carr, P. Dorey, and C. Dunning. In preparation

  3. [11]

    P.Clarkson, D.Gómez-Ullate, Y.Grandati, andR.Milson.Cyclicmayadiagramsandrational solutions of higher order painlevé systems.Studies in Applied Mathematics, 144(3):357–385, 2020

    2020

  4. [12]

    De Martino and D

    D. De Martino and D. Masoero. Asymptotic analysis of noisy fitness maximization, ap- plied to metabolism & growth.Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment, 2016(12):123502, 2016

    2016

  5. [13]

    Di Francesco, P

    P. Di Francesco, P. Mathieu, and D. Sénéchal.Conformal field theory. Springer Science & Business Media, 2012

    2012

  6. [14]

    Donaldson.Riemann surfaces

    S. Donaldson.Riemann surfaces. Oxford University Press, 2011

    2011

  7. [15]

    Dorey, C

    P. Dorey, C. Dunning, D. Masoero, J. Suzuki, and R. Tateo. Pseudo-differential equations, and the Bethe ansatz for the classical Lie algebras.Nuclear Phys. B, 772(3):249–289, 2007

    2007

  8. [16]

    Dorey and R

    P. Dorey and R. Tateo. Anharmonic oscillators, the thermodynamic Bethe ansatz,and non- linear integral equations.J.Phys., A32:L419–L425, 1999

    1999

  9. [17]

    Differential equations in the spectral parameter.Commu- nications in mathematical physics, 103(2):177–240, 1986

    J Duistermaat and F Grünbaum. Differential equations in the spectral parameter.Commu- nications in mathematical physics, 103(2):177–240, 1986

    1986

  10. [18]

    Feigin and E

    B. Feigin and E. Frenkel. Quantization of soliton systems and Langlands duality. InExploring new structures and natural constructions in mathematical physics, volume 61 ofAdv. Stud. Pure Math., pages 185–274. Math. Soc. Japan, Tokyo, 2011

    2011

  11. [19]

    Felder, A

    G. Felder, A. Hemery, and A. Veselov. Zeros of wronskians of hermite polynomials and young diagrams. Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena, 241(23-24):2131–2137, 2012

    2012

  12. [20]

    Fioravanti

    D. Fioravanti. Geometrical loci and CFTs via the Virasoro symmetry of the mKdV-SG hier- archy: an excursus.Phys. Lett. B, 609(1-2):173–179, 2005

    2005

  13. [21]

    Frenkel and D

    E. Frenkel and D. Hernandez. Spectra of quantum Kdv hamiltonians, Langlands duality, and affine opers.Communications in Mathematical Physics, 362(2):361–414, 2018

    2018

  14. [22]

    Frenkel, P

    E. Frenkel, P. Koroteev, D. S Sage, and A. Zeitlin. q-opers, QQ-systems, and Bethe Ansatz. arXiv preprint arXiv:2002.07344, 2020

    2002 arXiv

  15. [23]

    H. Hauser. The classical artin approximation theorems.Bulletin of the American Mathemat- ical Society, 54(4):595–633, 2017

    2017

  16. [24]

    Langlands and Y

    R. Langlands and Y. Saint-Aubin. Algebro-geometric aspects of the bethe equations. In Strings and symmetries, pages 40–53. Springer, 1995

    1995

  17. [25]

    Lukyanov and A.B

    S.L. Lukyanov and A.B. Zamolodchikov. Quantum Sine(h)-Gordon Model and Classical In- tegrable Equations.JHEP, 1007:008, 2010

    2010

  18. [26]

    Masoero and A

    D. Masoero and A. Raimondo. Opers for higher states of quantum kdv models.Communica- tions in Mathematical Physics, 378(1):1–74, 2020

    2020

  19. [27]

    Masoero and A

    D. Masoero and A. Raimondo. Opers for higher states of the quantum Boussinesq model. In Asymptotic, Algebraic and Geometric Aspects of Integrable Systems, Springer Proceedings in Mathematics & Statistics, 2020 (to appear)

    2020

  20. [28]

    Masoero, A

    D. Masoero, A. Raimondo, and D. Valeri. Bethe Ansatz and the Spectral Theory of Affine Lie Algebra-Valued Connections I. The simply-laced Case.Comm. Math. Phys., 344(3):719–750, 2016

    2016

  21. [29]

    Masoero, A

    D. Masoero, A. Raimondo, and D. Valeri. Bethe Ansatz and the Spectral Theory of Affine Lie algebra–Valued Connections II: The Non Simply–Laced Case.Comm. Math. Phys., 349(3):1063–1105, 2017

    2017

  22. [30]

    Masoero and P

    D. Masoero and P. Roffelsen. Poles of Painlevé IV rationals and their distribution.SIGMA. Symmetry, Integrability and Geometry: Methods and Applications, 14:002, 2018. 49

    2018

  23. [31]

    Oblomkov

    A. Oblomkov. Monodromy-free schrödinger operators with quadratically increasing poten- tials. Theoretical and Mathematical Physics, 121(3):1574–1584, 1999

    1999

  24. [32]

    J. Sun. Polynomial relations forq-characters via the ODE/IM correspondence.SIGMA Sym- metry Integrability Geom. Methods Appl., 8:Paper 028, 34, 2012

    2012

  25. [33]

    J. Suzuki. Functional relations in stokes multipliers and solvable models related to uq (a (1) n). Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General, 33(17):3507, 2000. Grupo de Física Matemática da Universidade de Lisboa, Edifício C6 Campo Grande, Lisboa, Portugal. F aculdade de...

    2000

Pith tools

Reviewed August 27, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.