REVIEW 3 cited by
Neural Thompson Sampling
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
abstract
Thompson Sampling (TS) is one of the most effective algorithms for solving contextual multi-armed bandit problems. In this paper, we propose a new algorithm, called Neural Thompson Sampling, which adapts deep neural networks for both exploration and exploitation. At the core of our algorithm is a novel posterior distribution of the reward, where its mean is the neural network approximator, and its variance is built upon the neural tangent features of the corresponding neural network. We prove that, provided the underlying reward function is bounded, the proposed algorithm is guaranteed to achieve a cumulative regret of $\mathcal{O}(T^{1/2})$, which matches the regret of other contextual bandit algorithms in terms of total round number $T$. Experimental comparisons with other benchmark bandit algorithms on various data sets corroborate our theory.
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
PinEqualizer: Full Funnel Content Exploration and Debiasing System at Pinterest
A full-funnel exploration and debiasing system deployed at Pinterest is reported to increase fresh-content impressions by ~350% and lift user-engagement and content-provider metrics.
-
SoK: The Pitfalls of Deep Reinforcement Learning for Cybersecurity
Across 66 DRL-for-cybersecurity papers, the authors identify 11 recurring methodological pitfalls—averaging 5.8 per paper—and demonstrate their impact in four environments.
-
Neural Variance-aware Dueling Bandits with Deep Representation and Shallow Exploration
Variance-aware neural dueling bandit algorithms achieve sublinear regret of order O(d sqrt(sum sigma_t^2) + sqrt(d T)) for wide networks on nonlinear utilities.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.