REVIEW 1 cited by
WER we are and WER we think we are
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Natural language processing of conversational speech requires the availability of high-quality transcripts. In this paper, we express our skepticism towards the recent reports of very low Word Error Rates (WERs) achieved by modern Automatic Speech Recognition (ASR) systems on benchmark datasets. We outline several problems with popular benchmarks and compare three state-of-the-art commercial ASR systems on an internal dataset of real-life spontaneous human conversations and HUB'05 public benchmark. We show that WERs are significantly higher than the best reported results. We formulate a set of guidelines which may aid in the creation of real-life, multi-domain datasets with high quality annotations for training and testing of robust ASR systems.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
PSRB: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Evaluating Persian ASR Systems
PSRB, a 10.4-hour Persian benchmark built from 3,372 clips and 756 speakers, evaluates ten ASR models and introduces SW-WER, showing that systems are far weaker on regional accents, children's speech, and informal aud...
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.