Pith. Sign in

RECORD

Be It Unresolved: Measuring Time Delays from Lensed Supernovae

Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics · Submitted 8 Oct 2020

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim We develop a method that successfully identifies such systems, with a false positive rate of $\lesssim 5\%$, and measures the time delays with a completeness of $\gtrsim 93\%$ and with a bias of $\lesssim 0.5\%$ for $\Delta t_{\rm fit} \gtrsim 10$ days.

how it is stated · asserted 1.00 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv ID2010.03774 (version 1)
Pith IDHGSHGYIM, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationAlex G. Kim, Arman Shafieloo, Eric V. Linder, Satadru Bag. "Be It Unresolved: Measuring Time Delays from Lensed Supernovae." arXiv:2010.03774 (2020). https://pith.science/paper/HGSHGYIM
Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13.0 via TypeSafe API, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 5,093 input tokens.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.05 · states limitation 0.66 · human participants 0.01 · controlled comparison 0.09 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.99 · compares with prior results 0.09 · mentions code or data availability 0.03.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v1. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

Gravitationally lensed Type Ia supernovae may be the next frontier in cosmic probes, able to deliver independent constraints on dark energy, spatial curvature, and the Hubble constant. Measurements of time delays between the multiple images become more incisive due to the standardized candle nature of the source, monitoring for months rather than years, and partial immunity to microlensing. While currently extremely rare, hundreds of such systems should be detected by upcoming time domain surveys. Even more will have the images spatially unresolved, with the observed lightcurve a superposition of time delayed image fluxes. We investigate whether unresolved images can be recognized as lensed sources given only lightcurve information, and whether time delays can be extracted robustly. We develop a method that successfully identifies such systems, with a false positive rate of $\lesssim 5\%$, and measures the time delays with a completeness of $\gtrsim 93\%$ and with a bias of $\lesssim 0.5\%$ for $\Delta t_{\rm fit} \gtrsim 10$ days.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 Gravitationally lensed Type Ia supernovae may be the next frontier in cosmic probes, able to deliver independent constraints on dark energy, spatial curvature, and the Hubble constant. background 1.00 0.05 0.03 hedged possibility 1.00
s1 Measurements of time delays between the multiple images become more incisive due to the standardized candle nature of the source, monitoring for months rather than years, and partial immunity to microlensing. background 0.98 0.10 0.04 asserted 0.99
s2 While currently extremely rare, hundreds of such systems should be detected by upcoming time domain surveys. background 0.98 0.08 0.02 asserted 0.61
s3 Even more will have the images spatially unresolved, with the observed lightcurve a superposition of time delayed image fluxes. background 0.94 0.07 0.03 asserted 0.76
s4 We investigate whether unresolved images can be recognized as lensed sources given only lightcurve information, and whether time delays can be extracted robustly. contribution 0.66 0.46 0.04 unclear 0.44
s5 We develop a method that successfully identifies such systems, with a false positive rate of $\lesssim 5\%$, and measures the time delays with a completeness of $\gtrsim 93\%$ and with a bias of $\lesssim 0.5\%$ for $\Delta t_{\rm fit} \gtrsim 10$ days. result 0.75 0.97 0.91 asserted 1.00

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: method or tool 1.00 · evidence from simulation or computation 0.99.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v1
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper
Original abstract

Gravitationally lensed Type Ia supernovae may be the next frontier in cosmic probes, able to deliver independent constraints on dark energy, spatial curvature, and the Hubble constant. Measurements of time delays between the multiple images become more incisive due to the standardized candle nature of the source, monitoring for months rather than years, and partial immunity to microlensing. While currently extremely rare, hundreds of such systems should be detected by upcoming time domain surveys. Even more will have the images spatially unresolved, with the observed lightcurve a superposition of time delayed image fluxes. We investigate whether unresolved images can be recognized as lensed sources given only lightcurve information, and whether time delays can be extracted robustly. We develop a method that successfully identifies such systems, with a false positive rate of $\lesssim 5\%$, and measures the time delays with a completeness of $\gtrsim 93\%$ and with a bias of $\lesssim 0.5\%$ for $\Delta t_{\rm fit} \gtrsim 10$ days.

Human review
References
How the literature uses it

6 arXiv papers cite this in 18 sentences

Each citing sentence is taken from the citing paper's LaTeX source and typed by Pith's classifier. A label appears at probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), a contest at 0.7 or more; the quoted words are the citing authors'. How each label was checked · JSON

Papers citing it · 12 sentences without a confident label

Builds on it 1 paper
Uses its method or tool 1 paper
Cites it as support 2 papers
Cites it as background 1 paper

What it cites · 29 sentences without a confident label

Uses the method or tool of 5 papers
Uses data or values from 1 paper
Cites as support 1 paper
Cites as background 6 papers

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.