Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

Kinematic constraints beyond zsimeq0 using calibrated GRB correlations

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2010.05218 v1 pith:AJ6VN5SO submitted 2020-10-11 astro-ph.CO

Kinematic constraints beyond zsimeq0 using calibrated GRB correlations

classification astro-ph.CO
keywords correlationsgamma-rayburstscalibratedcosmographiccosmologicaldatahierarchies
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

The dynamics of the Universe are revised using high-redshift data from gamma-ray bursts to constrain cosmographic parameters by means of model-independent techniques. Considering samples from four gamma-ray burst correlations and two hierarchies up to $j_0$ and $s_0$, respectively, we derived limits over the expansion history of the Universe. Since cosmic data span outside $z\simeq0$, we investigated additional cosmographic methods such as auxiliary variables and Pad\'e approximations. Bezi\'er polynomials were employed to calibrate our correlations and heal the circularity problem. Several Markov chain Monte Carlo simulations were performed on the model-independently calibrated Amati, Ghirlanda, Yonetoku, and combo correlations to obtain $1$--$\sigma$ and $2$--$\sigma$ confidence levels and to test the standard cosmological model. Reasonable results are found up to $j_0$ and $s_0$ hierarchies, respectively, only partially alleviating the tension on local $H_0$ measurements as $j_0$ hierarchy is considered. Discussions on systematic errors have been extensively reported here. Our findings show that the $\Lambda$CDM model is not fully confirmed using gamma-ray bursts. Indications against a genuine cosmological constant are summarized and commented on in detail.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Model-independent test of the cosmic distance duality relation with recent observational data

    astro-ph.CO 2026-03 conditional novelty 6.0

    Two model-independent methods applied to latest SN and BAO data find the cosmic distance duality relation consistent with observations within 1 sigma and no evidence of violation.

  2. Investigating the cosmic distance duality relation with gamma-ray bursts

    astro-ph.CO 2025-09 reject novelty 5.0

    Combined gamma-ray burst and multi-probe data show no significant violation of the cosmic distance duality relation and prefer a Planck-like Hubble constant.

  3. Mapping the redshift drift at various redshifts through cosmography

    astro-ph.CO 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    Cosmographic Taylor and Padé models fitted to Pantheon+SH0ES+GRB+DESI BAO data yield redshift drift predictions compatible with ΛCDM and ω0ω1CDM at 1-2σ, with mock drift data tightening q0 and j0 bounds.