Pith. Sign in

RECORD

Substance over Style: Document-Level Targeted Content Transfer

Computation and Language · Submitted 16 Oct 2020

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim Both automatic and human evaluations show that our model out-performs existing methods by generating coherent and diverse rewrites that obey the constraint while remaining close to the original document.

how it is stated · asserted 1.00 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv ID2010.08618 (version 1)
Pith IDLY6MBAJ3, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationAllison Hegel, Asli Celikyilmaz, Bill Dolan, Sudha Rao. "Substance over Style: Document-Level Targeted Content Transfer." arXiv:2010.08618 (2020). https://pith.science/paper/LY6MBAJ3
Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13.0 via TypeSafe API, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 5,026 input tokens.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.23 · states limitation 0.15 · human participants 0.55 · controlled comparison 0.70 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.06 · compares with prior results 0.95 · mentions code or data availability 0.89.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v1. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

Existing language models excel at writing from scratch, but many real-world scenarios require rewriting an existing document to fit a set of constraints. Although sentence-level rewriting has been fairly well-studied, little work has addressed the challenge of rewriting an entire document coherently. In this work, we introduce the task of document-level targeted content transfer and address it in the recipe domain, with a recipe as the document and a dietary restriction (such as vegan or dairy-free) as the targeted constraint. We propose a novel model for this task based on the generative pre-trained language model (GPT-2) and train on a large number of roughly-aligned recipe pairs (https://github.com/microsoft/document-level-targeted-content-transfer). Both automatic and human evaluations show that our model out-performs existing methods by generating coherent and diverse rewrites that obey the constraint while remaining close to the original document. Finally, we analyze our model's rewrites to assess progress toward the goal of making language generation more attuned to constraints that are substantive rather than stylistic.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 Existing language models excel at writing from scratch, but many real-world scenarios require rewriting an existing document to fit a set of constraints. background 0.99 0.04 0.02 asserted 1.00
s1 Although sentence-level rewriting has been fairly well-studied, little work has addressed the challenge of rewriting an entire document coherently. gap 0.99 0.05 0.02 asserted 0.99
s2 In this work, we introduce the task of document-level targeted content transfer and address it in the recipe domain, with a recipe as the document and a dietary restriction (such as vegan or dairy-free) as the targeted constraint. contribution 1.00 0.88 0.04 asserted 0.97
s3 We propose a novel model for this task based on the generative pre-trained language model (GPT-2) and train on a large number of roughly-aligned recipe pairs (https://github.com/microsoft/document-level-targeted-content-transfer). method 0.96 0.96 0.04 asserted 0.99
s4 Both automatic and human evaluations show that our model out-performs existing methods by generating coherent and diverse rewrites that obey the constraint while remaining close to the original document. result 1.00 0.96 0.81 asserted 1.00
s5 Finally, we analyze our model's rewrites to assess progress toward the goal of making language generation more attuned to constraints that are substantive rather than stylistic. contribution 0.66 0.90 0.15 unclear 0.48

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: method or tool 1.00 · evidence from observation or experiment 0.97.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v1
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper
Original abstract

Existing language models excel at writing from scratch, but many real-world scenarios require rewriting an existing document to fit a set of constraints. Although sentence-level rewriting has been fairly well-studied, little work has addressed the challenge of rewriting an entire document coherently. In this work, we introduce the task of document-level targeted content transfer and address it in the recipe domain, with a recipe as the document and a dietary restriction (such as vegan or dairy-free) as the targeted constraint. We propose a novel model for this task based on the generative pre-trained language model (GPT-2) and train on a large number of roughly-aligned recipe pairs (https://github.com/microsoft/document-level-targeted-content-transfer). Both automatic and human evaluations show that our model out-performs existing methods by generating coherent and diverse rewrites that obey the constraint while remaining close to the original document. Finally, we analyze our model's rewrites to assess progress toward the goal of making language generation more attuned to constraints that are substantive rather than stylistic.

Human review
How the literature uses it

What this paper does with the arXiv papers it cites

Each citing sentence is taken from the citing paper's LaTeX source and typed by Pith's classifier. A label appears at probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), a contest at 0.7 or more; the quoted words are the citing authors'. How each label was checked · JSON

What it cites · 10 sentences without a confident label

Contests 1 paper
Uses the method or tool of 3 papers
Cites as support 1 paper
  • This strategy has proven effective in other domains, including automatic storytelling, where prompting a model with a rough “storyline" helps models stay on-topic [ref] .

    Plan-And-Write: Towards Better Automatic Storytelling · Contextual Rewriter + Ingredient Prompt · 0.97

Cites as background 4 papers

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.