REVIEW 2 cited by
Rethinking Document-level Neural Machine Translation
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Rethinking Document-level Neural Machine Translation
read the original abstract
This paper does not aim at introducing a novel model for document-level neural machine translation. Instead, we head back to the original Transformer model and hope to answer the following question: Is the capacity of current models strong enough for document-level translation? Interestingly, we observe that the original Transformer with appropriate training techniques can achieve strong results for document translation, even with a length of 2000 words. We evaluate this model and several recent approaches on nine document-level datasets and two sentence-level datasets across six languages. Experiments show that document-level Transformer models outperforms sentence-level ones and many previous methods in a comprehensive set of metrics, including BLEU, four lexical indices, three newly proposed assistant linguistic indicators, and human evaluation.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Beyond Chunking: Discourse-Aware Hierarchical Retrieval for Long Document Question Answering
A hierarchical QA framework converts RST discourse trees into enhanced sentence representations for structure-guided retrieval and reports consistent gains over baselines on four datasets across genres and languages.
-
An Explainable Approach to Document-level Translation Evaluation with Topic Modeling
A topic-modeling framework measures document-level thematic consistency in translations by aligning key tokens across languages with a bilingual dictionary and scoring via cosine similarity, providing explainable insi...
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.