Pith. sign in

REVIEW 7 cited by

Cosmic shear power spectra in practice

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2010.09717 v1 pith:H3KESEDB submitted 2020-10-19 astro-ph.CO

Cosmic shear power spectra in practice

classification astro-ph.CO
keywords powershearspectraassociatedcosmiccosmologicalcovarianceprobes
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

Cosmic shear is one of the most powerful probes of Dark Energy, targeted by several current and future galaxy surveys. Lensing shear, however, is only sampled at the positions of galaxies with measured shapes in the catalog, making its associated sky window function one of the most complicated amongst all projected cosmological probes of inhomogeneities, as well as giving rise to inhomogeneous noise. Partly for this reason, cosmic shear analyses have been mostly carried out in real-space, making use of correlation functions, as opposed to Fourier-space power spectra. Since the use of power spectra can yield complementary information and has numerical advantages over real-space pipelines, it is important to develop a complete formalism describing the standard unbiased power spectrum estimators as well as their associated uncertainties. Building on previous work, this paper contains a study of the main complications associated with estimating and interpreting shear power spectra, and presents fast and accurate methods to estimate two key quantities needed for their practical usage: the noise bias and the Gaussian covariance matrix, fully accounting for survey geometry, with some of these results also applicable to other cosmological probes. We demonstrate the performance of these methods by applying them to the latest public data releases of the Hyper Suprime-Cam and the Dark Energy Survey collaborations, quantifying the presence of systematics in our measurements and the validity of the covariance matrix estimate. We make the resulting power spectra, covariance matrices, null tests and all associated data necessary for a full cosmological analysis publicly available.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 7 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Analytical covariances for catalogue-based pseudo-$C_\ell$s

    astro-ph.CO 2026-07 conditional novelty 7.0

    A new analytic method computes disconnected covariance matrices for catalogue-based pseudo-Cℓ power spectra by smoothing source positions and treating self-pair shot noise exactly.

  2. Galactic Science with the LiteBIRD satellite: Spectral characterization of diffuse Galactic polarized emission at the angular power spectrum level

    astro-ph.GA 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0

    LiteBIRD is forecast to measure Galactic polarized dust and synchrotron spectral parameters with errors as low as σ(T_d)≈0.2 K, σ(β_d)≈0.006, σ(β_s)≈0.04, and to detect E/B and T/P spectral discrepancies in the diffuse ISM.

  3. Dipoles for everyone: the pseudo-$C_\ell$ approach to directional stacking

    astro-ph.CO 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Directional stacking signals are reconstructed without information loss as cross-power spectra between the target field and the E/B modes of the spin field weighted by galaxy density.

  4. If at First You Don't Succeed, Trispectrum: I. Estimating the Matter Power Spectrum Covariance with Higher-Order Statistics

    astro-ph.CO 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Estimators from squeezed bispectrum and collapsed trispectrum recover unbiased small-scale matter power spectrum covariance at the percent level using 25 Quijote simulations.

  5. Constraints on Annihilating Dark Matter from Gamma-Ray Background-Galaxy Shape Correlations: Model-independent Null Results and Moderate Template-based Signals

    astro-ph.CO 2026-07 accept novelty 5.5

    Fourier-space gamma-ray–cosmic-shear cross-correlations give model-independent null results that exclude thermal WIMP annihilation for 7–40 GeV masses under high substructure boost and wino-like 2–3 TeV scenarios unde...

  6. Low-redshift constraints on structure growth from CMB lensing tomography

    astro-ph.CO 2025-10 conditional novelty 5.0

    Low-redshift galaxy clustering and CMB lensing tomography with hybrid effective field theory gives S8=0.79±0.06, consistent with Planck, while data alone prefer Ωm=0.245±0.024.

  7. Analytical method for computing the covariance matrix of cosmic shear two-point correlation function

    astro-ph.CO 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    The improved Narrow Kernel Approximation fails to match simulation-based covariances for real-space cosmic shear 2PCF under survey masks due to off-diagonal harmonic-space errors, while the weighted quartic-counts met...