Pith. Sign in

RECORD

Deep Learning is Singular, and That's Good

Machine Learning · Submitted 22 Oct 2020

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim Via a mix of theory and experiment, we present an invitation to singular learning theory as a vehicle for understanding deep learning and suggest important future work to make singular learning theory directly applicable to how deep learning is performed in practice.

how it is stated · hedged possibility 0.53 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv ID2010.11560 (version 1)
Pith IDKPTCRM7F, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationDaniel Murfet, Hui Li, Jesse Gell-Redman, Mingming Gong, Susan Wei, Thomas Quella. "Deep Learning is Singular, and That's Good." arXiv:2010.11560 (2020). https://pith.science/paper/KPTCRM7F
Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13.0 via TypeSafe API, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 3,639 input tokens.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.05 · states limitation 0.14 · human participants 0.03 · controlled comparison 0.02 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.04 · compares with prior results 0.10 · mentions code or data availability 0.02.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v1. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

In singular models, the optimal set of parameters forms an analytic set with singularities and classical statistical inference cannot be applied to such models. This is significant for deep learning as neural networks are singular and thus "dividing" by the determinant of the Hessian or employing the Laplace approximation are not appropriate. Despite its potential for addressing fundamental issues in deep learning, singular learning theory appears to have made little inroads into the developing canon of deep learning theory. Via a mix of theory and experiment, we present an invitation to singular learning theory as a vehicle for understanding deep learning and suggest important future work to make singular learning theory directly applicable to how deep learning is performed in practice.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 In singular models, the optimal set of parameters forms an analytic set with singularities and classical statistical inference cannot be applied to such models. background 1.00 0.06 0.10 asserted 1.00
s1 This is significant for deep learning as neural networks are singular and thus "dividing" by the determinant of the Hessian or employing the Laplace approximation are not appropriate. background 0.81 0.06 0.14 asserted 1.00
s2 Despite its potential for addressing fundamental issues in deep learning, singular learning theory appears to have made little inroads into the developing canon of deep learning theory. gap 0.95 0.07 0.09 asserted 0.95
s3 Via a mix of theory and experiment, we present an invitation to singular learning theory as a vehicle for understanding deep learning and suggest important future work to make singular learning theory directly applicable to how deep learning is performed in practice. contribution 0.85 0.74 0.51 hedged possibility 0.53

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: position or commentary 1.00 · evidence from argument 0.72.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v1
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper
Original abstract

In singular models, the optimal set of parameters forms an analytic set with singularities and classical statistical inference cannot be applied to such models. This is significant for deep learning as neural networks are singular and thus "dividing" by the determinant of the Hessian or employing the Laplace approximation are not appropriate. Despite its potential for addressing fundamental issues in deep learning, singular learning theory appears to have made little inroads into the developing canon of deep learning theory. Via a mix of theory and experiment, we present an invitation to singular learning theory as a vehicle for understanding deep learning and suggest important future work to make singular learning theory directly applicable to how deep learning is performed in practice.

Human review
How the literature uses it

4 arXiv papers cite this in 6 sentences

Each citing sentence is taken from the citing paper's LaTeX source and typed by Pith's classifier. A label appears at probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), a contest at 0.7 or more; the quoted words are the citing authors'. How each label was checked · JSON

Papers citing it · 5 sentences without a confident label

Cites it as background 1 paper
  • For an introduction to singular learning theory in the context of deep learning see [ref] .

    Geometry of Program Synthesis · Preliminaries · 0.97

What it cites · 10 sentences without a confident label

Contests 1 paper
Cites as support 1 paper
  • The competitive performance of SiLU on standard benchmarks [ref] shows that the non-analyticity of ReLU is probably not fundamental.

    Searching for Activation Functions · Simple functions and complex singularities · 0.98

Cites as background 2 papers
  • It is folklore in the deep learning community that flatness of minima is related to generalisation [ref] and this claim has been revisited in recent years [ref] .

    A Bayesian Perspective on Generalization and Stochastic Gradient Descent · Volume dimension, effective degrees of freedom, and flatness · 0.96

  • It is folklore in the deep learning community that flatness of minima is related to generalisation [ref] and this claim has been revisited in recent years [ref] .

    Three Factors Influencing Minima in SGD · Volume dimension, effective degrees of freedom, and flatness · 0.96

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.