Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

A semi-supervised Machine Learning search for never-seen Gravitational-Wave sources

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2010.11949 v1 pith:3UE52BER submitted 2020-10-22 astro-ph.IM astro-ph.SR

A semi-supervised Machine Learning search for never-seen Gravitational-Wave sources

classification astro-ph.IM astro-ph.SR
keywords searchdatasourcesbeenlearningmodelssignalsspectrograms
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
abstract

By now, tens of gravitational-wave (GW) events have been detected by the LIGO and Virgo detectors. These GWs have all been emitted by compact binary coalescence, for which we have excellent predictive models. However, there might be other sources for which we do not have reliable models. Some are expected to exist but to be very rare (e.g., supernovae), while others may be totally unanticipated. So far, no unmodeled sources have been discovered, but the lack of models makes the search for such sources much more difficult and less sensitive. We present here a search for unmodeled GW signals using semi-supervised machine learning. We apply deep learning and outlier detection algorithms to labeled spectrograms of GW strain data, and then search for spectrograms with anomalous patterns in public LIGO data. We searched $\sim 13\%$ of the coincident data from the first two observing runs. No candidates of GW signals were detected in the data analyzed. We evaluate the sensitivity of the search using simulated signals, we show that this search can detect spectrograms containing unusual or unexpected GW patterns, and we report the waveforms and amplitudes for which a $50\%$ detection rate is achieved.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Robustness of Sensitivity Evaluations for Gravitational Wave Detection Algorithms

    gr-qc 2025-09 conditional novelty 5.0

    AresGW model 1's injection detection count at a false-alarm rate of 1/month varies with noise dataset by up to 39% coefficient of variation, while sensitive distance varies by only a few percent.