REVIEW 2 cited by
Rethinking embedding coupling in pre-trained language models
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
We re-evaluate the standard practice of sharing weights between input and output embeddings in state-of-the-art pre-trained language models. We show that decoupled embeddings provide increased modeling flexibility, allowing us to significantly improve the efficiency of parameter allocation in the input embedding of multilingual models. By reallocating the input embedding parameters in the Transformer layers, we achieve dramatically better performance on standard natural language understanding tasks with the same number of parameters during fine-tuning. We also show that allocating additional capacity to the output embedding provides benefits to the model that persist through the fine-tuning stage even though the output embedding is discarded after pre-training. Our analysis shows that larger output embeddings prevent the model's last layers from overspecializing to the pre-training task and encourage Transformer representations to be more general and more transferable to other tasks and languages. Harnessing these findings, we are able to train models that achieve strong performance on the XTREME benchmark without increasing the number of parameters at the fine-tuning stage.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Similarity All The Way Up: Multilingual Generalization in LLMs Relies on Language-Level Similarity Structures
LLM embeddings largely reproduce the Indo-European language family tree, and how faithfully a model reproduces that tree correlates with its XNLI multilingual performance.
-
Survey of NLU Benchmarks Diagnosing Linguistic Phenomena: Why not Standardize Diagnostics Benchmarks?
A survey of NLU diagnostics benchmarks finds no shared naming convention or standard set of linguistic phenomena, and asks whether the field should build an ISO-like evaluation standard.
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.