Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Differentially Private (Gradient) Expectation Maximization Algorithm with Statistical Guarantees

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2010.13520 v3 pith:JE2WFIKE submitted 2020-10-22 cs.LG cs.CRstat.ML

classification cs.LGcs.CRstat.ML
keywords gradientguaranteesstatisticalalgorithmmixturemodelmodelsdata
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

(Gradient) Expectation Maximization (EM) is a widely used algorithm for estimating the maximum likelihood of mixture models or incomplete data problems. A major challenge facing this popular technique is how to effectively preserve the privacy of sensitive data. Previous research on this problem has already lead to the discovery of some Differentially Private (DP) algorithms for (Gradient) EM. However, unlike in the non-private case, existing techniques are not yet able to provide finite sample statistical guarantees. To address this issue, we propose in this paper the first DP version of (Gradient) EM algorithm with statistical guarantees. Moreover, we apply our general framework to three canonical models: Gaussian Mixture Model (GMM), Mixture of Regressions Model (MRM) and Linear Regression with Missing Covariates (RMC). Specifically, for GMM in the DP model, our estimation error is near optimal in some cases. For the other two models, we provide the first finite sample statistical guarantees. Our theory is supported by thorough numerical experiments.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Aggregate-then-Calibrate for Human-centered Assessment with Theoretical Guarantees

    cs.LG 2026-08 reject novelty 5.0 of 10

    Aggregate-then-Calibrate projects model scores onto a human-derived consensus ranking, claiming theoretical guarantees over model-only assessment; the central proofs have important gaps.

Pith tools