Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Optimal Client Sampling for Federated Learning

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2010.13723 v3 pith:JFHO755Y submitted 2020-10-26 cs.LG cs.DC

classification cs.LGcs.DC
keywords clientclientscommunicationfederatedformulamethodsonlyoptimal
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

It is well understood that client-master communication can be a primary bottleneck in Federated Learning. In this work, we address this issue with a novel client subsampling scheme, where we restrict the number of clients allowed to communicate their updates back to the master node. In each communication round, all participating clients compute their updates, but only the ones with "important" updates communicate back to the master. We show that importance can be measured using only the norm of the update and give a formula for optimal client participation. This formula minimizes the distance between the full update, where all clients participate, and our limited update, where the number of participating clients is restricted. In addition, we provide a simple algorithm that approximates the optimal formula for client participation, which only requires secure aggregation and thus does not compromise client privacy. We show both theoretically and empirically that for Distributed SGD (DSGD) and Federated Averaging (FedAvg), the performance of our approach can be close to full participation and superior to the baseline where participating clients are sampled uniformly. Moreover, our approach is orthogonal to and compatible with existing methods for reducing communication overhead, such as local methods and communication compression methods.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Adaptive Federated LoRA in Heterogeneous Wireless Networks with Independent Sampling

    cs.LG 2025-05 reject novelty 6.0 of 10

    An adaptive federated LoRA scheduler jointly tunes client sampling probabilities and LoRA sketching ratios to minimize wall-clock fine-tuning time, with experiments reporting 2.8 to 4.2 times speedups over prior methods.

  2. WallStreetFeds: Client-Specific Tokens as Investment Vehicles in Federated Learning

    cs.LG 2025-06 reject novelty 5.0 of 10

    A tokenized reward-sharing framework for federated learning that lets third parties invest in client-specific tokens traded on an automated market maker.

Pith tools