Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 cited by

Do Wide and Deep Networks Learn the Same Things? Uncovering How Neural Network Representations Vary with Width and Depth

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2010.15327 v2 pith:BTVCACNV submitted 2020-10-29 cs.LG

classification cs.LG
keywords representationsblockdepthmodelmodelsstructurewidtharchitectures
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

A key factor in the success of deep neural networks is the ability to scale models to improve performance by varying the architecture depth and width. This simple property of neural network design has resulted in highly effective architectures for a variety of tasks. Nevertheless, there is limited understanding of effects of depth and width on the learned representations. In this paper, we study this fundamental question. We begin by investigating how varying depth and width affects model hidden representations, finding a characteristic block structure in the hidden representations of larger capacity (wider or deeper) models. We demonstrate that this block structure arises when model capacity is large relative to the size of the training set, and is indicative of the underlying layers preserving and propagating the dominant principal component of their representations. This discovery has important ramifications for features learned by different models, namely, representations outside the block structure are often similar across architectures with varying widths and depths, but the block structure is unique to each model. We analyze the output predictions of different model architectures, finding that even when the overall accuracy is similar, wide and deep models exhibit distinctive error patterns and variations across classes.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Grounding Functional Similarity by Invariance-Aware Model Stitching

    cs.LG 2025-05 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    FuLA, a task-agnostic stitching objective that aligns intermediate features through the frozen end network, is claimed to be a more reliable functional similarity metric than task-based stitching.

  2. Data eccentricity, asymptotics of Gaussian RBF reproducing kernel Hilbert space, and kernel PCA

    cs.LG 2026-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    After rescaling, the Gaussian RBF kernel reproduces the linear kernel's geometry and PCA output in the large-bandwidth limit, with an error controlled by the ratio of data diameter to median pairwise distance.

  3. Criticality analysis of nuclear binding energy neural networks

    nucl-th 2025-08 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    On a two-input nuclear binding energy network, the paper validates ANNFT predictions for variance, kurtosis, and an optimal depth-to-width ratio r*=0.034 under SGD, while adaptive optimizers obscure criticality.

  4. AI Agent Behavioral Science

    q-bio.NC 2025-06 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    AI agents should be studied as behavioral entities shaped by context and interaction, not only as trained models.

Pith tools