REVIEW 2 cited by
Adversarial Examples in Constrained Domains
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
Machine learning algorithms have been shown to be vulnerable to adversarial manipulation through systematic modification of inputs (e.g., adversarial examples) in domains such as image recognition. Under the default threat model, the adversary exploits the unconstrained nature of images; each feature (pixel) is fully under control of the adversary. However, it is not clear how these attacks translate to constrained domains that limit which and how features can be modified by the adversary (e.g., network intrusion detection). In this paper, we explore whether constrained domains are less vulnerable than unconstrained domains to adversarial example generation algorithms. We create an algorithm for generating adversarial sketches: targeted universal perturbation vectors which encode feature saliency within the envelope of domain constraints. To assess how these algorithms perform, we evaluate them in constrained (e.g., network intrusion detection) and unconstrained (e.g., image recognition) domains. The results demonstrate that our approaches generate misclassification rates in constrained domains that were comparable to those of unconstrained domains (greater than 95%). Our investigation shows that the narrow attack surface exposed by constrained domains is still sufficiently large to craft successful adversarial examples; and thus, constraints do not appear to make a domain robust. Indeed, with as little as five randomly selected features, one can still generate adversarial examples.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Insights on Adversarial Attacks for Tabular Machine Learning via a Systematic Literature Review
A systematic review of 53 papers on adversarial attacks for tabular machine learning finds the field fragmented, with efficacy over-emphasized and transferability, plausibility, and semantic preservation under-addressed.
-
Constrained Network Adversarial Attacks: Validity, Robustness, and Transferability
On NSL-KDD, between 19.7% and 76.2% of adversarial examples from common attacks violate the paper's network constraints, and filtering them to feasible inputs sharply lowers measured attack severity on several classifiers.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.