Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Concentration Inequalities for Statistical Inference

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2011.02258 v4 pith:S5QF3SLC submitted 2020-11-04 math.ST cs.LGmath.PRstat.MLstat.TH

classification math.STcs.LGmath.PRstat.MLstat.TH
keywords concentrationinequalitiesresultsconstantshigh-dimensionalinferencereviewsettings
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

This paper gives a review of concentration inequalities which are widely employed in non-asymptotical analyses of mathematical statistics in a wide range of settings, from distribution-free to distribution-dependent, from sub-Gaussian to sub-exponential, sub-Gamma, and sub-Weibull random variables, and from the mean to the maximum concentration. This review provides results in these settings with some fresh new results. Given the increasing popularity of high-dimensional data and inference, results in the context of high-dimensional linear and Poisson regressions are also provided. We aim to illustrate the concentration inequalities with known constants and to improve existing bounds with sharper constants.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Understanding the Kronecker Matrix-Vector Complexity of Linear Algebra

    cs.DS 2025-02 conditional novelty 8.0 of 10

    For Kronecker product query oracles, trace and spectral norm estimation require exponentially many queries for all well-conditioned algorithms, and {±1} probe alphabets make zero-testing exponentially weaker than Gaus...

  2. High-Dimensional Model Averaging via Cross-Validation

    math.ST 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A high-dimensional model averaging framework with minimax-optimal weight estimation, asymptotic optimality, nearly-oracle rates when a correct model is present, and post-averaging simultaneous inference.

Pith tools