Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Detecting Hallucinated Content in Conditional Neural Sequence Generation

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2011.02593 v3 pith:HSA55U3L submitted 2020-11-05 cs.CL cs.AI

classification cs.CLcs.AI
keywords sequencecontentdatademonstratedetectfluenthallucinatedhallucinations
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Neural sequence models can generate highly fluent sentences, but recent studies have also shown that they are also prone to hallucinate additional content not supported by the input. These variety of fluent but wrong outputs are particularly problematic, as it will not be possible for users to tell they are being presented incorrect content. To detect these errors, we propose a task to predict whether each token in the output sequence is hallucinated (not contained in the input) and collect new manually annotated evaluation sets for this task. We also introduce a method for learning to detect hallucinations using pretrained language models fine tuned on synthetic data that includes automatically inserted hallucinations Experiments on machine translation (MT) and abstractive summarization demonstrate that our proposed approach consistently outperforms strong baselines on all benchmark datasets. We further demonstrate how to use the token-level hallucination labels to define a fine-grained loss over the target sequence in low-resource MT and achieve significant improvements over strong baseline methods. We also apply our method to word-level quality estimation for MT and show its effectiveness in both supervised and unsupervised settings. Codes and data available at https://github.com/violet-zct/fairseq-detect-hallucination.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Retrieval Feedback Memory Enhancement Large Model Retrieval Generation Method

    cs.IR 2025-08 reject novelty 6.0 of 10

    RFM-RAG improves RAG-based QA by iteratively building an evidence pool and stopping via a learned sufficiency classifier.

Pith tools