Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Explainable AI meets Healthcare: A Study on Heart Disease Dataset

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2011.03195 v1 pith:W2IJ4W4A submitted 2020-11-06 cs.LG cs.AI

classification cs.LGcs.AI
keywords healthcaretechniquesexplainablemodelartificialdatasetdiseaseexplainability
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

With the increasing availability of structured and unstructured data and the swift progress of analytical techniques, Artificial Intelligence (AI) is bringing a revolution to the healthcare industry. With the increasingly indispensable role of AI in healthcare, there are growing concerns over the lack of transparency and explainability in addition to potential bias encountered by predictions of the model. This is where Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) comes into the picture. XAI increases the trust placed in an AI system by medical practitioners as well as AI researchers, and thus, eventually, leads to an increasingly widespread deployment of AI in healthcare. In this paper, we present different interpretability techniques. The aim is to enlighten practitioners on the understandability and interpretability of explainable AI systems using a variety of techniques available which can be very advantageous in the health-care domain. Medical diagnosis model is responsible for human life and we need to be confident enough to treat a patient as instructed by a black-box model. Our paper contains examples based on the heart disease dataset and elucidates on how the explainability techniques should be preferred to create trustworthiness while using AI systems in healthcare.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. On the Performance of Cyber-Biomedical Features for Intrusion Detection in Healthcare 5.0

    cs.CR 2025-06 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    Network traffic features dominate intrusion detection in the WUSTL-EHMS-2020 Healthcare 5.0 dataset, while biomedical features, especially temperature, add signal for detecting spoofing attacks.

  2. Explainable AI for Securing Healthcare in IoT-Integrated 6G Wireless Networks

    cs.LG 2025-05 conditional novelty 3.0 of 10

    Applying three explainable AI tools to a random forest model on the WUSTL-HDRL-2024 dataset yields qualitative feature-level explanations aimed at attack detection in 6G healthcare networks, but the validation is limi...

Pith tools