REVIEW 1 cited by
Deep learning architectures for inference of AC-OPF solutions
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
We present a systematic comparison between neural network (NN) architectures for inference of AC-OPF solutions. Using fully connected NNs as a baseline we demonstrate the efficacy of leveraging network topology in the models by constructing abstract representations of electrical grids in the graph domain, for both convolutional and graph NNs. The performance of the NN architectures is compared for regression (predicting optimal generator set-points) and classification (predicting the active set of constraints) settings. Computational gains for obtaining optimal solutions are also presented.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Revisiting Deep AC-OPF
Simple linear baselines match or beat a leading neural surrogate for AC-OPF voltage prediction, while the introduced transformer improves over the neural approach but not over linear regression.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.