Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 cited by

A new B-flavour anomaly in B_(d,s)to K^(*0)bar{K}^(*0): anatomy and interpretation

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2011.07867 v2 pith:B5BSBH4G submitted 2020-11-16 hep-ph

A new B-flavour anomaly in B_(d,s)to K^(*0)bar{K}^(*0): anatomy and interpretation

classification hep-ph
keywords anomalyanatomycomponentsdecaysdiscussfractionlongitudinalnon-leptonic
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

In the context of the recently measured non-leptonic decays $B_{d}\to K^{*0}\bar{K}^{*0}$ and $B_{s}\to K^{*0}\bar{K}^{*0}$ we analyse the anatomy of the $L_{VV}$ observable that compares the longitudinal components of $B_s \to VV$ and $B_d \to VV$ decays. This observable is cleaner than the longitudinal polarisation fraction as it is afflicted only at subleading order in a $1/m_b$ expansion by the theoretical uncertainties arising in the transverse components entering the polarisation fraction. Focusing on the particular case of $B_{d}\to K^{*0}\bar{K}^{*0}$ and $B_{s}\to K^{*0}\bar{K}^{*0}$, we discuss the main sources of hadronic uncertainty in the SM. We find for the SM prediction $L_{K^*\bar{K}^*}=19.5^{+9.3}_{-6.8}$, which implies a $2.6\sigma$ tension with respect to the most recent data, pointing to a deficit in the $b \to s$ transition of the non-leptonic decay versus the corresponding $b \to d$ transition. We discuss possible New Physics explanations for this deviation, first at the level of the Weak Effective Theory and we identify that the two Wilson coefficients ${\cal C}_{4}$ and ${\cal C}_{8g}$ can play a central role in explaining this anomaly. Finally, we briefly explore two different simplified New Physics models which can explain the anomaly through a contribution either in ${\cal C}_4$ (Kaluza-Klein gluon) or in ${\cal C}_{8g}$, with a significant amount of fine tuning, but possible connections to the $b \to s \ell \ell$ anomalies.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Method to study $CP$ violation in $B_s^0\to K_S K^\pm \pi^\mp$ decays

    hep-ph 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    A method is developed to relate amplitudes for B_s^0 → K_S K* resonances in the two final states, enabling the first tagged decay-time-dependent Dalitz analysis to measure the effective weak phase φ_s^eff.

  2. Anomalies in Hadronic $B \to VV$ Decays

    hep-ph 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0

    Charmless B→VV decays under SU(3)_F show 5.2σ tension for ρ,K* modes and >7σ when ϕ and ω are included, while isospin-only ρK* fits remain acceptable.

  3. New insights into the $b\rightarrow c \bar{u}q$ puzzle through Top-Bottom synergies

    hep-ph 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Anomalies in b to c u-bar q transitions remain puzzling as proposed new physics scenarios involving SU(2) doublets are not significantly relaxed by collider dilution or factorization breakdown.

  4. Measurement of the branching fractions and longitudinal polarisations of $B^0_{(s)} \to K^{*0} \kern 0.18em \overline{\kern -0.18em K}{}^{*0}$ decays

    hep-ex 2025-12 accept novelty 4.0

    LHCb measures f_L^d = 0.600 and f_L^s = 0.159 for B to K* Kbar* decays and reports a ratio L of 4.92 that confirms 4.4 sigma discrepancy with theory.