Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Enforcing robust control guarantees within neural network policies

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2011.08105 v2 pith:NGDDGGXE submitted 2020-11-16 cs.LG math.OC

classification cs.LGmath.OC
keywords controlmethodsrobustguaranteesneuraloftenperformancerobustness
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

When designing controllers for safety-critical systems, practitioners often face a challenging tradeoff between robustness and performance. While robust control methods provide rigorous guarantees on system stability under certain worst-case disturbances, they often yield simple controllers that perform poorly in the average (non-worst) case. In contrast, nonlinear control methods trained using deep learning have achieved state-of-the-art performance on many control tasks, but often lack robustness guarantees. In this paper, we propose a technique that combines the strengths of these two approaches: constructing a generic nonlinear control policy class, parameterized by neural networks, that nonetheless enforces the same provable robustness criteria as robust control. Specifically, our approach entails integrating custom convex-optimization-based projection layers into a neural network-based policy. We demonstrate the power of this approach on several domains, improving in average-case performance over existing robust control methods and in worst-case stability over (non-robust) deep RL methods.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Revisiting Deep AC-OPF

    eess.SY 2025-08 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Simple linear baselines match or beat a leading neural surrogate for AC-OPF voltage prediction, while the introduced transformer improves over the neural approach but not over linear regression.

Pith tools