Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Sidney Coleman's Dirac Lecture "Quantum Mechanics in Your Face"

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2011.12671 v2 pith:YI7NP3O4 submitted 2020-08-13 physics.hist-ph hep-thquant-ph

classification physics.hist-phhep-thquant-ph
keywords lecturesidneycolemandiracuniversityamericanaprilbeen
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

This is a write-up of Sidney Coleman's classic lecture first given as a Dirac Lecture at Cambridge University and later recorded when repeated at the New England sectional meeting of the American Physical Society (April 9, 1994). My sources have been this recording and a copy of the slides Sidney send to me after he gave the lecture as a Physics Colloquium at Stanford University some time between 1995 and 1998. To preserve both the scientific content and most of the charm, I have kept the editing to a minimum, but did add a bibliography containing the references Sidney mentioned.--Martin Greiter

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Real-Time Scattering in Ising Field Theory using Matrix Product States

    hep-th 2024-11 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    Matrix product state simulations of real-time scattering in Ising Field Theory reproduce perturbative results near free fermion and E8 limits and support a conjectured crossover in high-energy elastic versus inelastic...

  2. A possible statistics loophole in Bell's theorem

    physics.gen-ph 2024-12 reject novelty 3.0 of 10

    The paper's 'unknowable' statistics loophole in Bell tests collapses once standard concentration inequalities are applied, so the central claim is not supported.

Pith tools