Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Consistency testing for robust phase estimation

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2011.13442 v1 pith:MC64UBP6 submitted 2020-11-26 quant-ph math.STstat.TH

classification quant-phmath.STstat.TH
keywords checksestimationphaserobustconsistencyidentifynoisetest
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

We present an extension to the robust phase estimation protocol, which can identify incorrect results that would otherwise lie outside the expected statistical range. Robust phase estimation is increasingly a method of choice for applications such as estimating the effective process parameters of noisy hardware, but its robustness is dependent on the noise satisfying certain threshold assumptions. We provide consistency checks that can indicate when those thresholds have been violated, which can be difficult or impossible to test directly. We test these consistency checks for several common noise models, and identify two possible checks with high accuracy in locating the point in a robust phase estimation run at which further estimates should not be trusted. One of these checks may be chosen based on resource availability, or they can be used together in order to provide additional verification.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Pith tools