Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

Fast and Complete: Enabling Complete Neural Network Verification with Rapid and Massively Parallel Incomplete Verifiers

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2011.13824 v2 pith:SUEVI5JL submitted 2020-11-27 cs.AI cs.LG

classification cs.AIcs.LG
keywords completeincompletelirpaproblemproceduresub-domainsverificationapproaches
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Formal verification of neural networks (NNs) is a challenging and important problem. Existing efficient complete solvers typically require the branch-and-bound (BaB) process, which splits the problem domain into sub-domains and solves each sub-domain using faster but weaker incomplete verifiers, such as Linear Programming (LP) on linearly relaxed sub-domains. In this paper, we propose to use the backward mode linear relaxation based perturbation analysis (LiRPA) to replace LP during the BaB process, which can be efficiently implemented on the typical machine learning accelerators such as GPUs and TPUs. However, unlike LP, LiRPA when applied naively can produce much weaker bounds and even cannot check certain conflicts of sub-domains during splitting, making the entire procedure incomplete after BaB. To address these challenges, we apply a fast gradient based bound tightening procedure combined with batch splits and the design of minimal usage of LP bound procedure, enabling us to effectively use LiRPA on the accelerator hardware for the challenging complete NN verification problem and significantly outperform LP-based approaches. On a single GPU, we demonstrate an order of magnitude speedup compared to existing LP-based approaches.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. OpenAlex reports about 60 citations worldwide. Full citation record

  1. Formal Verification of Variational Quantum Circuits

    quant-ph 2025-07 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    The paper introduces an abstract-interpretation framework with interval domains for formally verifying robustness of variational quantum circuit classifiers, and reports certified perturbation bounds on Iris and MNIST.

  2. Conformal Mixed-Integer Constraint Learning with Feasibility Guarantees

    cs.LG 2025-06 reject novelty 6.0 of 10

    C-MICL embeds conformal prediction sets into mixed-integer constraint learning, claiming a 1-alpha probability that optimized solutions are feasible for the true unknown constraint.

  3. Learning to Optimize by Differentiable Programming

    cs.MS 2026-01 unverdicted novelty 2.0 of 10

    A tutorial survey of differentiable-programming-based first-order optimization, with dual-based PyTorch case studies and no new results.

Pith tools