REVIEW 2 cited by
Revisiting Rainbow: Promoting more Insightful and Inclusive Deep Reinforcement Learning Research
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Since the introduction of DQN, a vast majority of reinforcement learning research has focused on reinforcement learning with deep neural networks as function approximators. New methods are typically evaluated on a set of environments that have now become standard, such as Atari 2600 games. While these benchmarks help standardize evaluation, their computational cost has the unfortunate side effect of widening the gap between those with ample access to computational resources, and those without. In this work we argue that, despite the community's emphasis on large-scale environments, the traditional small-scale environments can still yield valuable scientific insights and can help reduce the barriers to entry for underprivileged communities. To substantiate our claims, we empirically revisit the paper which introduced the Rainbow algorithm [Hessel et al., 2018] and present some new insights into the algorithms used by Rainbow.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Octax: Accelerated CHIP-8 Arcade Environments for Reinforcement Learning in JAX
Octax is a JAX-based CHIP-8 emulator that runs thousands of parallel arcade environments on GPUs (350k steps/s) and supports LLM-generated games for RL training.
-
Ensemble Elastic DQN: A Step Dependent Ensemble Approach for Reducing Overestimation in Deep Value-Based Reinforcement Learning
EEDQN sets its bootstrap horizon using a Q-value difference threshold and then uses the ensemble mean for one-step targets and the ensemble minimum for multi-step targets, reporting the best final score on four of fiv...
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.