Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Disentangling Derivatives, Uncertainty and Error in Gaussian Process Models

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2012.04947 v1 pith:JILK5RYM submitted 2020-12-09 stat.ML cs.LG

Disentangling Derivatives, Uncertainty and Error in Gaussian Process Models

classification stat.ML cs.LG
keywords errorpredictiveaccurateformulationfunctiongaussianproblemsthey
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

Gaussian Processes (GPs) are a class of kernel methods that have shown to be very useful in geoscience applications. They are widely used because they are simple, flexible and provide very accurate estimates for nonlinear problems, especially in parameter retrieval. An addition to a predictive mean function, GPs come equipped with a useful property: the predictive variance function which provides confidence intervals for the predictions. The GP formulation usually assumes that there is no input noise in the training and testing points, only in the observations. However, this is often not the case in Earth observation problems where an accurate assessment of the instrument error is usually available. In this paper, we showcase how the derivative of a GP model can be used to provide an analytical error propagation formulation and we analyze the predictive variance and the propagated error terms in a temperature prediction problem from infrared sounding data.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.