Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Calculating the initial energy density in heavy ion collisions by including the finite nuclear thickness

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2012.13825 v2 pith:KZEIJE3W submitted 2020-12-26 nucl-th nucl-ex

classification nucl-thnucl-ex
keywords energydensityenergiesfinitebjorkenformulaepsiloninitial
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
abstract

The initial energy density produced in heavy ion collisions can be estimated with the Bjorken energy density formula after choosing a proper formation time $\tau{_{\rm F}}$. However, the Bjorken formula breaks down at low energies because it neglects the finite nuclear thickness. Here we include both the finite time duration and finite longitudinal extension of the initial energy production. When $\tau{_{\rm F}}$ is not too much smaller than the crossing time of the two nuclei, our results are similar to those from a previous study that only considers the finite time duration. In particular, we find that at low energies the initial energy density has a much lower maximum value but evolves much longer than the Bjorken formula, while at large-enough $\tau{_{\rm F}}$ and/or high-enough energies our result approaches the Bjorken formula. We also find a qualitative difference in that our maximum energy density $\epsilon^{\rm max}$ at $\tau{_{\rm F}}=0$ is finite, while the Bjorken formula diverges as $1/\tau{_{\rm F}}$ and the previous result diverges as $\ln (1/\tau{_{\rm F}})$ at low energies but as $1/\tau{_{\rm F}}$ at high energies. Furthermore, our solution of the energy density approximately satisfies a scaling relation. As a result, the $\tau{_{\rm F}}$-dependence of $\epsilon^{\rm max}$ determines the $A$-dependence, and the weaker $\tau{_{\rm F}}$-dependence of $\epsilon^{\rm max}$ in our results at low energies means a slower increase of $\epsilon^{\rm max}$ with $A$.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Model Comparisons of Transverse Energy and Charged-Particle Multiplicity in A+A Collisions at Midrapidity from $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ $=$ 7.7 to 200~GeV

    nucl-ex 2025-06 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    A broad model-data comparison shows that PYTHIA, AMPT, HIJING, and SMASH all fail to reproduce PHENIX transverse energy and multiplicity at low beam energies and in peripheral collisions.

Pith tools