Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Optimal network online change point localisation

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2101.05477 v1 pith:4MR6K5BO submitted 2021-01-14 math.ST cs.LGstat.TH

classification math.STcs.LGstat.TH
keywords changealgorithmspointalphadetectionkappabounddelta
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
abstract

We study the problem of online network change point detection. In this setting, a collection of independent Bernoulli networks is collected sequentially, and the underlying distributions change when a change point occurs. The goal is to detect the change point as quickly as possible, if it exists, subject to a constraint on the number or probability of false alarms. In this paper, on the detection delay, we establish a minimax lower bound and two upper bounds based on NP-hard algorithms and polynomial-time algorithms, i.e., \[ \mbox{detection delay} \begin{cases} \gtrsim \log(1/\alpha) \frac{\max\{r^2/n, \, 1\}}{\kappa_0^2 n \rho},\\ \lesssim \log(\Delta/\alpha) \frac{\max\{r^2/n, \, \log(r)\}}{\kappa_0^2 n \rho}, & \mbox{with NP-hard algorithms},\\ \lesssim \log(\Delta/\alpha) \frac{r}{\kappa_0^2 n \rho}, & \mbox{with polynomial-time algorithms}, \end{cases} \] where $\kappa_0, n, \rho, r$ and $\alpha$ are the normalised jump size, network size, entrywise sparsity, rank sparsity and the overall Type-I error upper bound. All the model parameters are allowed to vary as $\Delta$, the location of the change point, diverges. The polynomial-time algorithms are novel procedures that we propose in this paper, designed for quick detection under two different forms of Type-I error control. The first is based on controlling the overall probability of a false alarm when there are no change points, and the second is based on specifying a lower bound on the expected time of the first false alarm. Extensive experiments show that, under different scenarios and the aforementioned forms of Type-I error control, our proposed approaches outperform state-of-the-art methods.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. On Non-Stationary Dynamic Pricing: Adaptivity and Optimality

    stat.ML 2026-07 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    An adaptive dynamic-pricing algorithm achieves, up to logarithmic factors, the minimax optimal regret for both abrupt and smooth non-stationarity in contextual GLM demand, and comes with a matching lower bound.

  2. Change Point Localization and Inference in Dynamic Multilayer Networks

    stat.ME 2025-06 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    A seeded binary segmentation plus tensor PCA refinement consistently localizes change points in dynamic multilayer random dot product graphs and yields limiting distributions for confidence intervals.

Pith tools