REVIEW 1 cited by
Reviving Purpose Limitation and Data Minimisation in Data-Driven Systems
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
This paper determines whether the two core data protection principles of data minimisation and purpose limitation can be meaningfully implemented in data-driven systems. While contemporary data processing practices appear to stand at odds with these principles, we demonstrate that systems could technically use much less data than they currently do. This observation is a starting point for our detailed techno-legal analysis uncovering obstacles that stand in the way of meaningful implementation and compliance as well as exemplifying unexpected trade-offs which emerge where data protection law is applied in practice. Our analysis seeks to inform debates about the impact of data protection on the development of artificial intelligence in the European Union, offering practical action points for data controllers, regulators, and researchers.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Position: EU AI Act's Research Exemptions Can Break the Publication Norms of Major AI Conferences
Publishing AI research artifacts, such as models and code on GitHub or Hugging Face, may fall outside the EU AI Act's research exceptions and trigger provider obligations.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.