Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Free Lunch for Few-shot Learning: Distribution Calibration

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2101.06395 v3 pith:LBVKTDVA submitted 2021-01-16 cs.LG cs.CV

classification cs.LGcs.CV
keywords distributioncalibratedclassesexamplesnumberadequateclassifierfeature
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Learning from a limited number of samples is challenging since the learned model can easily become overfitted based on the biased distribution formed by only a few training examples. In this paper, we calibrate the distribution of these few-sample classes by transferring statistics from the classes with sufficient examples, then an adequate number of examples can be sampled from the calibrated distribution to expand the inputs to the classifier. We assume every dimension in the feature representation follows a Gaussian distribution so that the mean and the variance of the distribution can borrow from that of similar classes whose statistics are better estimated with an adequate number of samples. Our method can be built on top of off-the-shelf pretrained feature extractors and classification models without extra parameters. We show that a simple logistic regression classifier trained using the features sampled from our calibrated distribution can outperform the state-of-the-art accuracy on two datasets (~5% improvement on miniImageNet compared to the next best). The visualization of these generated features demonstrates that our calibrated distribution is an accurate estimation.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. On the Generalization and Adaptation Ability of Machine-Generated Text Detectors in Academic Writing

    cs.AI 2024-12 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A new 749K-sample academic-writing benchmark shows that supervised detectors outperform metric-based ones, attribution is difficult for metric methods, and adapting to new LLMs leaves a sizable gap.

Pith tools