Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

Zero-Cost Proxies for Lightweight NAS

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2101.08134 v2 pith:DUZBDLGR submitted 2021-01-20 cs.LG cs.AIcs.NE

classification cs.LGcs.AIcs.NE
keywords proxiessearchzero-costaccuracybestmodelsproxycompared
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
abstract

Neural Architecture Search (NAS) is quickly becoming the standard methodology to design neural network models. However, NAS is typically compute-intensive because multiple models need to be evaluated before choosing the best one. To reduce the computational power and time needed, a proxy task is often used for evaluating each model instead of full training. In this paper, we evaluate conventional reduced-training proxies and quantify how well they preserve ranking between multiple models during search when compared with the rankings produced by final trained accuracy. We propose a series of zero-cost proxies, based on recent pruning literature, that use just a single minibatch of training data to compute a model's score. Our zero-cost proxies use 3 orders of magnitude less computation but can match and even outperform conventional proxies. For example, Spearman's rank correlation coefficient between final validation accuracy and our best zero-cost proxy on NAS-Bench-201 is 0.82, compared to 0.61 for EcoNAS (a recently proposed reduced-training proxy). Finally, we use these zero-cost proxies to enhance existing NAS search algorithms such as random search, reinforcement learning, evolutionary search and predictor-based search. For all search methodologies and across three different NAS datasets, we are able to significantly improve sample efficiency, and thereby decrease computation, by using our zero-cost proxies. For example on NAS-Bench-101, we achieved the same accuracy 4$\times$ quicker than the best previous result. Our code is made public at: https://github.com/mohsaied/zero-cost-nas.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. NN-Former: Rethinking Graph Structure in Neural Architecture Representation

    cs.LG 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    NN-Former improves neural accuracy and latency prediction by using attention masks over sibling nodes in the architecture graph.

  2. Searching Efficient Deep Architectures for Radar Target Detection using Monte-Carlo Tree Search

    eess.SP 2025-06 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Monte-Carlo tree search found a radar detection network with 60% fewer parameters than a baseline U-Net at comparable detection performance.

  3. Scaling Closed-Loop Feature Channel Configuration with LLMs

    cs.LG 2026-07 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    Scaling LLM-generated channel-configuration search from sparse to 250 candidates per cycle yields a modest mean-accuracy trend, a frontier improvement from 0.3144 to 0.3676, and measurable channel-allocation regularities.

Pith tools