Pith. sign in

REVIEW

A Comparative Study of Straight-Strip and Zigzag-Interleaved Anode Patterns for MPGD Readouts

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2101.12134 v1 pith:OEQK6SAY submitted 2021-01-28 physics.ins-det hep-exnucl-ex

A Comparative Study of Straight-Strip and Zigzag-Interleaved Anode Patterns for MPGD Readouts

classification physics.ins-det hep-exnucl-ex
keywords anodechargepadspatternsperformancestraightclouddetectors
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

Due to their simplicity and versatility of design, straight strip or rectangular pad anode structures are frequently employed with micro-pattern gas detectors to reconstruct high precision space points for various tracking applications. The particle impact point is typically determined by interpolating the charge collected by several neighboring pads. However, to effectively extract the inherent positional information, the lateral spacing of the straight pads must be significantly smaller than the extent of the charge cloud. In contrast, highly interleaved anode patterns, such as zigzags, can adequately sample the charge with a pitch comparable to the size of the charge cloud or even larger. This has the considerable advantage of providing the same performance while requiring far fewer instrumented channels. Additionally, the geometric parameters defining such zigzag structures may be tuned to provide a uniform detector response without the need for so-called pad response functions, while simultaneously maintaining excellent position resolution. We have measured the position resolution of a variety of zigzag shaped anode patterns optimized for various MPGDs, including GEM, Micromegas, and micro-RWELL and compared this performance to the same detectors equipped with straight pads of varying pitch. We report on the performance results of each readout structure, evaluated under identical conditions in a test beam.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.