REVIEW 8 cited by
A Comprehensive Survey and Experimental Comparison of Graph-Based Approximate Nearest Neighbor Search
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Approximate nearest neighbor search (ANNS) constitutes an important operation in a multitude of applications, including recommendation systems, information retrieval, and pattern recognition. In the past decade, graph-based ANNS algorithms have been the leading paradigm in this domain, with dozens of graph-based ANNS algorithms proposed. Such algorithms aim to provide effective, efficient solutions for retrieving the nearest neighbors for a given query. Nevertheless, these efforts focus on developing and optimizing algorithms with different approaches, so there is a real need for a comprehensive survey about the approaches' relative performance, strengths, and pitfalls. Thus here we provide a thorough comparative analysis and experimental evaluation of 13 representative graph-based ANNS algorithms via a new taxonomy and fine-grained pipeline. We compared each algorithm in a uniform test environment on eight real-world datasets and 12 synthetic datasets with varying sizes and characteristics. Our study yields novel discoveries, offerings several useful principles to improve algorithms, thus designing an optimized method that outperforms the state-of-the-art algorithms. This effort also helped us pinpoint algorithms' working portions, along with rule-of-thumb recommendations about promising research directions and suitable algorithms for practitioners in different fields.
Forward citations
Cited by 8 Pith papers
-
Towards Efficient and Scalable Distributed Vector Search with RDMA
CoTra runs a shared approximate-nearest-neighbor graph across 16 RDMA-connected machines and reaches 9.8-13.4x single-machine query throughput at 0.95 recall@10.
-
VecFlow: A High-Performance Vector Data Management System for Filtered-Search on GPUs
A label-centric GPU index that routes common labels through graph search and rare labels through brute-force scans achieves up to 135x higher filtered-search throughput than previous CPU approaches.
-
Toward Understanding Bugs in Vector Database Management Systems
A manual study of 1,463 confirmed bugs in 15 vector database systems yields a taxonomy of 5 symptom categories, 31 root causes, and 12 fix strategies.
-
DARTH: Declarative Recall Through Early Termination for Approximate Nearest Neighbor Search
DARTH learns to predict a query's current recall during HNSW/IVF search and stops early at a user-specified target, achieving speedups up to 14.6x on HNSW and 41.8x on IVF, yet 13-15% of queries miss the target.
-
HENN: A Hierarchical Epsilon Net Navigation Graph for Approximate Nearest Neighbor Search
HENN constructs hierarchical nearest-neighbor graphs with epsilon-net layers, claiming polylogarithmic query time and showing speedups over HNSW on skewed data.
-
Filtered Approximate Nearest Neighbor Search: A Unified Benchmark and Systematic Experimental Study [Experiment, Analysis & Benchmark]
A systematic benchmark of filtered nearest-neighbor search algorithms shows no single winner: filter-then-search methods excel at containment and equality filters, while hybrid methods dominate overlap filters.
-
Developing Visual Augmented Q&A System using Scalable Vision Embedding Retrieval & Late Interaction Re-ranker
A two-stage OpenSearch retriever plus ColPali late-interaction re-ranker matches full late-interaction recall@1 on ViDoRe while using 14 to 53 pages instead of hundreds to thousands per query.
-
MobileRAG: A Fast, Memory-Efficient, and Energy-Efficient Method for On-Device RAG
A fully on-device RAG pipeline using a partitioned, partially disk-loaded graph index and selective sentence-window reduction claims 1.72-8.89x faster vector search and up to 40.2% lower power than baselines, with com...
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.