Pith. Sign in

RECORD

Effects of quantum resources on the statistical complexity of quantum circuits

Quantum Physics · Submitted 5 Feb 2021

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim We show that the increase in the statistical complexity of a quantum circuit when an additional quantum channel is added to it is upper bounded by the free robustness of the added channel.

how it is stated · asserted 1.00 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv ID2102.03282 (version 1)
Pith IDPTSVBGPJ, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationDax Enshan Koh, Kaifeng Bu, Lu Li, Qingxian Luo, Yaobo Zhang. "Effects of quantum resources on the statistical complexity of quantum circuits." arXiv:2102.03282 (2021). https://pith.science/paper/PTSVBGPJ
Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13.0 via TypeSafe API, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 4,348 input tokens.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.03 · states limitation 0.18 · human participants 0.02 · controlled comparison 0.22 · randomized assignment 0.02 · states quantitative result 0.87 · compares with prior results 0.10 · mentions code or data availability 0.02.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v1. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

We investigate how the addition of quantum resources changes the statistical complexity of quantum circuits by utilizing the framework of quantum resource theories. Measures of statistical complexity that we consider include the Rademacher complexity and the Gaussian complexity, which are well-known measures in computational learning theory that quantify the richness of classes of real-valued functions. We derive bounds for the statistical complexities of quantum circuits that have limited access to certain resources and apply our results to two special cases: (1) stabilizer circuits that are supplemented with a limited number of T gates and (2) instantaneous quantum polynomial-time Clifford circuits that are supplemented with a limited number of CCZ gates. We show that the increase in the statistical complexity of a quantum circuit when an additional quantum channel is added to it is upper bounded by the free robustness of the added channel. Finally, we derive bounds for the generalization error associated with learning from training data arising from quantum circuits.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 We investigate how the addition of quantum resources changes the statistical complexity of quantum circuits by utilizing the framework of quantum resource theories. contribution 0.98 0.86 0.05 asserted 0.69
s1 Measures of statistical complexity that we consider include the Rademacher complexity and the Gaussian complexity, which are well-known measures in computational learning theory that quantify the richness of classes of real-valued functions. background 0.57 0.19 0.03 asserted 0.99
s2 We derive bounds for the statistical complexities of quantum circuits that have limited access to certain resources and apply our results to two special cases: (1) stabilizer circuits that are supplemented with a limited number of T gates and (2) instantaneous quantum polynomial-time Clifford circuits that are supplemented with a limited number of CCZ gates. contribution 0.89 0.96 0.12 asserted 0.99
s3 We show that the increase in the statistical complexity of a quantum circuit when an additional quantum channel is added to it is upper bounded by the free robustness of the added channel. result 1.00 0.94 0.46 asserted 1.00
s4 Finally, we derive bounds for the generalization error associated with learning from training data arising from quantum circuits. result 0.59 0.95 0.11 asserted 0.99

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: theoretical result 1.00 · evidence from proof or derivation 1.00.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v1
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper
Original abstract

We investigate how the addition of quantum resources changes the statistical complexity of quantum circuits by utilizing the framework of quantum resource theories. Measures of statistical complexity that we consider include the Rademacher complexity and the Gaussian complexity, which are well-known measures in computational learning theory that quantify the richness of classes of real-valued functions. We derive bounds for the statistical complexities of quantum circuits that have limited access to certain resources and apply our results to two special cases: (1) stabilizer circuits that are supplemented with a limited number of T gates and (2) instantaneous quantum polynomial-time Clifford circuits that are supplemented with a limited number of CCZ gates. We show that the increase in the statistical complexity of a quantum circuit when an additional quantum channel is added to it is upper bounded by the free robustness of the added channel. Finally, we derive bounds for the generalization error associated with learning from training data arising from quantum circuits.

Human review
References
How the literature uses it

7 arXiv papers cite this in 13 sentences

Each citing sentence is taken from the citing paper's LaTeX source and typed by Pith's classifier. A label appears at probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), a contest at 0.7 or more; the quoted words are the citing authors'. How each label was checked · JSON

Papers citing it · 6 sentences without a confident label

Builds on it 1 paper
  • In [ref] , we extended the above analysis by studying the dependence of the Rademacher complexity on general quantum resources by employing tools from the framework of quantum resource theories [ref] .

    Rademacher complexity of noisy quantum circuits · Introduction · 0.84

Uses its method or tool 1 paper
Compares with it 1 paper
Cites it as background 4 papers
  • Recent work has studied the training sample complexity needed for QML models to generalize [ref] .

    Theory for Equivariant Quantum Neural Networks · Equivariance versus barren plateaus, local minima and data requirements · 0.87

  • Some prior works have studied the generalization capabilities of quantum models, among them the classical learning-theoretic approaches of [ref] ; the more geometric perspective of [ref] ; and the information-theoretic technique of [ref] .

    Generalization in quantum machine learning from few training data · Related work on generalization · 0.99

  • Previous works have focused on showing how complexity measures depend on the different parts of the quantum model that implement the observable measurement, such as the quantum circuit ansatz [ref] , or the level of noise in the model [ref] .

    Structural risk minimization for quantum linear classifiers · Introduction · 0.80

What it cites · 3 sentences without a confident label

Cites as background 6 papers
  • These include magic [ref] , entanglement [ref] and coherence [ref] .

    Quantifying Superposition · Introduction · 0.97

  • Examples of variational quantum algorithms include the variational quantum eigensolver (VQE) for quantum chemistry [ref] , the quantum approximate optimization algorithm (QAOA) for optimization [ref] , and the quantum neural network (QNN) that generalizes the classical neural network [ref] .

    A Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm · Introduction · 0.92

  • Examples of variational quantum algorithms include the variational quantum eigensolver (VQE) for quantum chemistry [ref] , the quantum approximate optimization algorithm (QAOA) for optimization [ref] , and the quantum neural network (QNN) that generalizes the classical neural network [ref] .

    Classification with Quantum Neural Networks on Near Term Processors · Introduction · 0.92

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.