REVIEW 1 cited by
A Single-Timescale Method for Stochastic Bilevel Optimization
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
abstract
Stochastic bilevel optimization generalizes the classic stochastic optimization from the minimization of a single objective to the minimization of an objective function that depends the solution of another optimization problem. Recently, stochastic bilevel optimization is regaining popularity in emerging machine learning applications such as hyper-parameter optimization and model-agnostic meta learning. To solve this class of stochastic optimization problems, existing methods require either double-loop or two-timescale updates, which are sometimes less efficient. This paper develops a new optimization method for a class of stochastic bilevel problems that we term Single-Timescale stochAstic BiLevEl optimization (STABLE) method. STABLE runs in a single loop fashion, and uses a single-timescale update with a fixed batch size. To achieve an $\epsilon$-stationary point of the bilevel problem, STABLE requires ${\cal O}(\epsilon^{-2})$ samples in total; and to achieve an $\epsilon$-optimal solution in the strongly convex case, STABLE requires ${\cal O}(\epsilon^{-1})$ samples. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first bilevel optimization algorithm achieving the same order of sample complexity as the stochastic gradient descent method for the single-level stochastic optimization.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Exploring the Generalization Capabilities of AID-based Bi-level Optimization
AID-based bi-level optimization is uniformly stable with sample-dependent bounds comparable to single-level nonconvex SGD, and diminishing step sizes yield smaller generalization gaps than constant step sizes.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.