Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Disturbing Reinforcement Learning Agents with Corrupted Rewards

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2102.06587 v1 pith:7HQQ52CG submitted 2021-02-12 cs.LG cs.AI

classification cs.LGcs.AI
keywords learningattackexplorationrewardsstrategyalgorithmsdependingdomain
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Reinforcement Learning (RL) algorithms have led to recent successes in solving complex games, such as Atari or Starcraft, and to a huge impact in real-world applications, such as cybersecurity or autonomous driving. In the side of the drawbacks, recent works have shown how the performance of RL algorithms decreases under the influence of soft changes in the reward function. However, little work has been done about how sensitive these disturbances are depending on the aggressiveness of the attack and the learning exploration strategy. In this paper, we propose to fill this gap in the literature analyzing the effects of different attack strategies based on reward perturbations, and studying the effect in the learner depending on its exploration strategy. In order to explain all the behaviors, we choose a sub-class of MDPs: episodic, stochastic goal-only-rewards MDPs, and in particular, an intelligible grid domain as a benchmark. In this domain, we demonstrate that smoothly crafting adversarial rewards are able to mislead the learner, and that using low exploration probability values, the policy learned is more robust to corrupt rewards. Finally, in the proposed learning scenario, a counterintuitive result arises: attacking at each learning episode is the lowest cost attack strategy.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Provably Efficient Action-Manipulation Attack Against Continuous Reinforcement Learning

    cs.LG 2024-11 reject novelty 7.0 of 10

    LCBT is a trajectory-only tree-search attack that claims to steer continuous-action RL agents to target policies with sublinear attack cost, but the proof of the claim has a serious importance-sampling flaw.

Pith tools