REVIEW 1 cited by
Efficient Deviation Types and Learning for Hindsight Rationality in Extensive-Form Games
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Hindsight rationality is an approach to playing general-sum games that prescribes no-regret learning dynamics for individual agents with respect to a set of deviations, and further describes jointly rational behavior among multiple agents with mediated equilibria. To develop hindsight rational learning in sequential decision-making settings, we formalize behavioral deviations as a general class of deviations that respect the structure of extensive-form games. Integrating the idea of time selection into counterfactual regret minimization (CFR), we introduce the extensive-form regret minimization (EFR) algorithm that achieves hindsight rationality for any given set of behavioral deviations with computation that scales closely with the complexity of the set. We identify behavioral deviation subsets, the partial sequence deviation types, that subsume previously studied types and lead to efficient EFR instances in games with moderate lengths. In addition, we present a thorough empirical analysis of EFR instantiated with different deviation types in benchmark games, where we find that stronger types typically induce better performance.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
On the Complexity of the Optimal Correlated Equilibria in Extensive-Form Games
Deciding whether a correlated equilibrium with welfare above a threshold exists is PSPACE-hard for NFCE and NP-complete for EFCE, AFCE, EFCCE, NFCCE, and AFCCE in multiplayer extensive-form games; Nash threshold is ∃R...
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.