Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Differential Privacy and Byzantine Resilience in SGD: Do They Add Up?

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2102.08166 v3 pith:C66KGLSY submitted 2021-02-16 cs.LG cs.CRcs.DC

classification cs.LGcs.CRcs.DC
keywords byzantineresilienceprivacyalgorithmdifferentiallearningproblemtheoretical
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
abstract

This paper addresses the problem of combining Byzantine resilience with privacy in machine learning (ML). Specifically, we study if a distributed implementation of the renowned Stochastic Gradient Descent (SGD) learning algorithm is feasible with both differential privacy (DP) and $(\alpha,f)$-Byzantine resilience. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first work to tackle this problem from a theoretical point of view. A key finding of our analyses is that the classical approaches to these two (seemingly) orthogonal issues are incompatible. More precisely, we show that a direct composition of these techniques makes the guarantees of the resulting SGD algorithm depend unfavourably upon the number of parameters of the ML model, making the training of large models practically infeasible. We validate our theoretical results through numerical experiments on publicly-available datasets; showing that it is impractical to ensure DP and Byzantine resilience simultaneously.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools