Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Modular Design Patterns for Hybrid Learning and Reasoning Systems: a taxonomy, patterns and use cases

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2102.11965 v2 pith:F2K7CZNG submitted 2021-02-23 cs.AI cs.LG

classification cs.AIcs.LG
keywords patternssystemshybriddesignlargeneuro-symbolicdescribeelementary
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

The unification of statistical (data-driven) and symbolic (knowledge-driven) methods is widely recognised as one of the key challenges of modern AI. Recent years have seen large number of publications on such hybrid neuro-symbolic AI systems. That rapidly growing literature is highly diverse and mostly empirical, and is lacking a unifying view of the large variety of these hybrid systems. In this paper we analyse a large body of recent literature and we propose a set of modular design patterns for such hybrid, neuro-symbolic systems. We are able to describe the architecture of a very large number of hybrid systems by composing only a small set of elementary patterns as building blocks. The main contributions of this paper are: 1) a taxonomically organised vocabulary to describe both processes and data structures used in hybrid systems; 2) a set of 15+ design patterns for hybrid AI systems, organised in a set of elementary patterns and a set of compositional patterns; 3) an application of these design patterns in two realistic use-cases for hybrid AI systems. Our patterns reveal similarities between systems that were not recognised until now. Finally, our design patterns extend and refine Kautz' earlier attempt at categorising neuro-symbolic architectures.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Defining neurosymbolic AI

    cs.AI 2025-07 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    Neurosymbolic inference is defined as a Lebesgue integral over interpretations of the product of a logical selection function and a parametrized belief function, unifying many existing systems.

Pith tools