Pith. sign in

REVIEW

References in Wikipedia: The Editors' Perspective

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2102.12511 v2 pith:QZP3VYLS submitted 2021-02-24 cs.CL cs.CYcs.DL

Lucie-Aimée Kaffee , Hady Elsahar This is my paper · ORCID
classification cs.CLcs.CYcs.DL
keywords referenceswikipediaeditorsperspectivearticlearticlescollectioncreating
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

References are an essential part of Wikipedia. Each statement in Wikipedia should be referenced. In this paper, we explore the creation and collection of references for new Wikipedia articles from an editors' perspective. We map out the workflow of editors when creating a new article, emphasising how they select references.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools