Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Combinatorial Bandits under Strategic Manipulations

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2102.12722 v4 pith:MFLZALOY submitted 2021-02-25 cs.LG cs.AI

classification cs.LGcs.AI
keywords strategicadversarialbehaviorcombinatorialmanipulationsonlineregretunder
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
abstract

Strategic behavior against sequential learning methods, such as "click framing" in real recommendation systems, have been widely observed. Motivated by such behavior we study the problem of combinatorial multi-armed bandits (CMAB) under strategic manipulations of rewards, where each arm can modify the emitted reward signals for its own interest. This characterization of the adversarial behavior is a relaxation of previously well-studied settings such as adversarial attacks and adversarial corruption. We propose a strategic variant of the combinatorial UCB algorithm, which has a regret of at most $O(m\log T + m B_{max})$ under strategic manipulations, where $T$ is the time horizon, $m$ is the number of arms, and $B_{max}$ is the maximum budget of an arm. We provide lower bounds on the budget for arms to incur certain regret of the bandit algorithm. Extensive experiments on online worker selection for crowdsourcing systems, online influence maximization and online recommendations with both synthetic and real datasets corroborate our theoretical findings on robustness and regret bounds, in a variety of regimes of manipulation budgets.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools