Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Deepfakes Generation and Detection: State-of-the-art, open challenges, countermeasures, and way forward

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2103.00484 v2 pith:W2NLPCSE submitted 2021-02-25 cs.CR cs.LGcs.SDeess.ASeess.IV

classification cs.CRcs.LGcs.SDeess.ASeess.IV
keywords deepfakedetectiondeepfakesfuturegenerationalongapproacheschallenges
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Easy access to audio-visual content on social media, combined with the availability of modern tools such as Tensorflow or Keras, open-source trained models, and economical computing infrastructure, and the rapid evolution of deep-learning (DL) methods, especially Generative Adversarial Networks (GAN), have made it possible to generate deepfakes to disseminate disinformation, revenge porn, financial frauds, hoaxes, and to disrupt government functioning. The existing surveys have mainly focused on the detection of deepfake images and videos. This paper provides a comprehensive review and detailed analysis of existing tools and machine learning (ML) based approaches for deepfake generation and the methodologies used to detect such manipulations for both audio and visual deepfakes. For each category of deepfake, we discuss information related to manipulation approaches, current public datasets, and key standards for the performance evaluation of deepfake detection techniques along with their results. Additionally, we also discuss open challenges and enumerate future directions to guide future researchers on issues that need to be considered to improve the domains of both deepfake generation and detection. This work is expected to assist the readers in understanding the creation and detection mechanisms of deepfakes, along with their current limitations and future direction.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. A Lightweight and Interpretable Deepfakes Detection Framework

    cs.CV 2025-01 reject novelty 4.0 of 10

    A lightweight XGBoost detector that fuses facial landmarks with color-statistic 'heart rate' features reaches AUC 0.95 on the WLDR deepfake dataset, but the heart-rate claim is unsupported.

Pith tools