Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

Remember What You Want to Forget: Algorithms for Machine Unlearning

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2103.03279 v2 pith:W6XJJ2CA submitted 2021-03-04 cs.LG cs.AI

classification cs.LGcs.AI
keywords unlearningmachinemodelsamplesdatapointsdistributionguaranteeslearner
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
abstract

We study the problem of unlearning datapoints from a learnt model. The learner first receives a dataset $S$ drawn i.i.d. from an unknown distribution, and outputs a model $\widehat{w}$ that performs well on unseen samples from the same distribution. However, at some point in the future, any training datapoint $z \in S$ can request to be unlearned, thus prompting the learner to modify its output model while still ensuring the same accuracy guarantees. We initiate a rigorous study of generalization in machine unlearning, where the goal is to perform well on previously unseen datapoints. Our focus is on both computational and storage complexity. For the setting of convex losses, we provide an unlearning algorithm that can unlearn up to $O(n/d^{1/4})$ samples, where $d$ is the problem dimension. In comparison, in general, differentially private learning (which implies unlearning) only guarantees deletion of $O(n/d^{1/2})$ samples. This demonstrates a novel separation between differential privacy and machine unlearning.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. OpenAlex reports about 67 citations worldwide. Full citation record

  1. Unlearning as Distribution Restoration: A Controlled Counterfactual Study, a Validated Selective Screen, and the Limits of Oracle-Free Certification

    cs.LG 2026-07 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    Matching a retrained oracle on trained probes can certify models that still retain held-out forget knowledge, and oracle-free unlearning certification is only possible for counterfactual, non-inferable facts.

  2. Provable unlearning in topic modeling and downstream tasks

    cs.LG 2024-11 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    Provable (epsilon, delta)-unlearning algorithms for topic models achieve deletion capacity O~(m/(r^2 sqrt(nr))) before fine-tuning and O~(m q/(r sqrt(nr))) after fine-tuning, with the base model untouched in the downs...

  3. Mirror Mirror on the Wall, Have I Forgotten it All? A New Framework for Evaluating Machine Unlearning

    cs.LG 2025-05 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A formal indistinguishability definition of machine unlearning is introduced, current methods are shown to fail it empirically, and impossibility and utility-collapse results are claimed.

Pith tools