Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Should Graph Neural Networks Use Features, Edges, Or Both?

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2103.06857 v1 pith:5LMW5UWA submitted 2021-03-11 cs.LG

Should Graph Neural Networks Use Features, Edges, Or Both?

classification cs.LG
keywords graphgnnsfeaturesclassificationfindlearningnetworksneural
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) are the first choice for learning algorithms on graph data. GNNs promise to integrate (i) node features as well as (ii) edge information in an end-to-end learning algorithm. How does this promise work out practically? In this paper, we study to what extend GNNs are necessary to solve prominent graph classification problems. We find that for graph classification, a GNN is not more than the sum of its parts. We also find that, unlike features, predictions with an edge-only model do not always transfer to GNNs.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.