Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Optimal quantum discrimination of single-qubit unitary gates between two candidates

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2103.08208 v2 pith:Z6MCRJAI submitted 2021-03-15 quant-ph

Optimal quantum discrimination of single-qubit unitary gates between two candidates

classification quant-ph
keywords candidatesprotocolquantumunitarydiscriminationgatesoptimalsample
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

We analyze a discrimination problem of a single-qubit unitary gate with two candidates, where the candidates are not provided with their classical description, but their quantum sample is. More precisely, there are three unitary quantum gates -- one target and one sample for each of the two candidates -- whose classical description is unknown except for their dimension. The target gate is chosen equally among the candidates. We obtain the optimal protocol that maximizes the expected success probability, assuming the Haar distribution for the candidates. This problem is originally introduced in Hillery et al. (J. Mod. Opt. 2010), which provides a protocol achieving 7/8 in the expected success probability based on the ``unitary comparison" protocol of Andersson et al. (J. Phys. A 2003). The optimality of the protocol has been an open question since then. We prove the optimality of the comparison protocol, implying that only one of the two samples (one for each candidate) is needed to achieve an optimal discrimination. The optimization includes protocols outside the scope of quantum testers due to the dynamic ordering of the sample and target gates within a given protocol.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.