Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Interpretable Deep Learning: Interpretation, Interpretability, Trustworthiness, and Beyond

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2103.10689 v3 pith:QFPRJYXM submitted 2021-03-19 cs.LG

classification cs.LG
keywords interpretationdeepalgorithmsinterpretationsmodelsinterpretabilitylearningbeen
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Deep neural networks have been well-known for their superb handling of various machine learning and artificial intelligence tasks. However, due to their over-parameterized black-box nature, it is often difficult to understand the prediction results of deep models. In recent years, many interpretation tools have been proposed to explain or reveal how deep models make decisions. In this paper, we review this line of research and try to make a comprehensive survey. Specifically, we first introduce and clarify two basic concepts -- interpretations and interpretability -- that people usually get confused about. To address the research efforts in interpretations, we elaborate the designs of a number of interpretation algorithms, from different perspectives, by proposing a new taxonomy. Then, to understand the interpretation results, we also survey the performance metrics for evaluating interpretation algorithms. Further, we summarize the current works in evaluating models' interpretability using "trustworthy" interpretation algorithms. Finally, we review and discuss the connections between deep models' interpretations and other factors, such as adversarial robustness and learning from interpretations, and we introduce several open-source libraries for interpretation algorithms and evaluation approaches.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. OpenAlex reports about 29 citations worldwide. Full citation record

  1. fSRD: Fuzzy Spectral Region Decomposition -- Automated Multi Operator Koopman Representations via an Adaptive Spectral Learning Architecture

    cs.LG 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    fSRD automates multi-operator Koopman modelling by fitting local DMD models inside adaptively learned fuzzy regions of a data matrix, reporting high in-sample reconstruction accuracy on chaotic and high-dimensional data.

Pith tools