Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Nearest-neighbor connectedness theory: A general approach to continuum percolation

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2103.12406 v1 pith:PNG45YPP submitted 2021-03-23 cond-mat.stat-mech cond-mat.soft

classification cond-mat.stat-mechcond-mat.soft
keywords percolationapproxconnectednessdimensionsmethodargumentcarloclose
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
abstract

We introduce a method to estimate continuum percolation thresholds and illustrate its usefulness by investigating geometric percolation of non-interacting line segments and disks in two spatial dimensions. These examples serve as models for electrical percolation of elongated and flat nanofillers in thin film composites. While the standard contact volume argument and extensions thereof in connectedness percolation theory yield accurate predictions for slender nanofillers in three dimensions, they fail to do so in two dimensions, making our test a stringent one. In fact, neither a systematic order-by-order correction to the standard argument nor invoking the connectedness version of the Percus-Yevick approximation yield significant improvements for either type of particle. Making use of simple geometric considerations, our new method predicts a percolation threshold of $\rho_c l^2 \approx 5.83$ for segments of length $l$, which is close to the $\rho_c l^2 \approx 5.64$ found in Monte Carlo simulations. For disks of area $a$ we find $\rho_c a \approx 1.00$, close to the Monte Carlo result of $\rho_c a \approx 1.13$. We discuss the shortcomings of the conventional approaches and explain how usage of the nearest-neighbor distribution in our new method bypasses those complications.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Pith tools