Pith. Sign in

RECORD

Factorization of radiative leptonic D-meson decay with sub-leading power corrections

High Energy Physics - Phenomenology · Submitted 4 Apr 2021

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim Finally, we find that all the sub-leading power contributions are significant at $\lambda_D(\mu_0)=354\,\rm MeV$, and the next-to-leading power contributions will lead to $143\%$ in $\phi_{D,\rm I}^+$ and $120\%$ in $\phi_{D,\rm II}^+$ corrections to leading power vector form factors with $E_{\gamma}=0.5\,\rm GeV$.

how it is stated · asserted 1.00 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv ID2104.01562 (version 1)
Pith IDITN6F7OQ, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationLong-Sheng Lu. "Factorization of radiative leptonic D-meson decay with sub-leading power corrections." arXiv:2104.01562 (2021). https://pith.science/paper/ITN6F7OQ
Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13.0 via TypeSafe API, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 6,145 input tokens.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.93 · states limitation 0.94 · human participants 0.01 · controlled comparison 0.10 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.99 · compares with prior results 0.42 · mentions code or data availability 0.02.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v1. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

In this work, we calculate the sub-leading power contributions to the radiative leptonic $D\to\gamma \,\ell \,\nu$ decay. For the first time, we provide the analytic expressions of next-to-leading power contributions and the error estimation associated with the power expansion of ${\cal O}(\Lambda_{\rm QCD}/m_c)$. In our calculation, we adopt two different models of the $D$-meson distribution amplitudes $\phi_{D,\rm I}^+$ and $\phi_{D,\rm II}^+$. Within the framework of the QCD factorization as well as the dispersion relation, we evaluate the soft contribution up to the next-to-leading logarithmic accuracy, and the higher-twist contribution from the two-particle and three-particle distribution amplitudes is also considered. Finally, we find that all the sub-leading power contributions are significant at $\lambda_D(\mu_0)=354\,\rm MeV$, and the next-to-leading power contributions will lead to $143\%$ in $\phi_{D,\rm I}^+$ and $120\%$ in $\phi_{D,\rm II}^+$ corrections to leading power vector form factors with $E_{\gamma}=0.5\,\rm GeV$. As the corrections from the higher-twist and local sub-leading power contributions will be enhanced with the growing of the inverse moment, it is difficult to extract an appropriate inverse moment of the $D$-meson distribution amplitude. The predicted branching fractions are $(1.88_{-0.29}^{+0.36})\times10^{-5}$ for $\phi_{D,\rm I}^+$ and $(2.31_{-0.54}^{+0.65})\times10^{-5}$ for $\phi_{D,\rm II}^+$, respectively.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 In this work, we calculate the sub-leading power contributions to the radiative leptonic $D\to\gamma \,\ell \,\nu$ decay. contribution 1.00 0.97 0.04 asserted 0.99
s1 For the first time, we provide the analytic expressions of next-to-leading power contributions and the error estimation associated with the power expansion of ${\cal O}(\Lambda_{\rm QCD}/m_c)$. contribution 0.94 0.97 0.11 asserted 1.00
s2 In our calculation, we adopt two different models of the $D$-meson distribution amplitudes $\phi_{D,\rm I}^+$ and $\phi_{D,\rm II}^+$. method 0.99 0.92 0.02 asserted 1.00
s3 Within the framework of the QCD factorization as well as the dispersion relation, we evaluate the soft contribution up to the next-to-leading logarithmic accuracy, and the higher-twist contribution from the two-particle and three-particle distribution amplitudes is also considered. method 1.00 0.94 0.04 asserted 1.00
s4 Finally, we find that all the sub-leading power contributions are significant at $\lambda_D(\mu_0)=354\,\rm MeV$, and the next-to-leading power contributions will lead to $143\%$ in $\phi_{D,\rm I}^+$ and $120\%$ in $\phi_{D,\rm II}^+$ corrections to leading power vector form factors with $E_{\gamma}=0.5\,\rm GeV$. result 1.00 0.97 0.73 asserted 1.00
s5 As the corrections from the higher-twist and local sub-leading power contributions will be enhanced with the growing of the inverse moment, it is difficult to extract an appropriate inverse moment of the $D$-meson distribution amplitude. limitation 0.78 0.53 0.06 asserted 0.95
s6 The predicted branching fractions are $(1.88_{-0.29}^{+0.36})\times10^{-5}$ for $\phi_{D,\rm I}^+$ and $(2.31_{-0.54}^{+0.65})\times10^{-5}$ for $\phi_{D,\rm II}^+$, respectively. result 1.00 0.95 0.18 asserted 1.00

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: theoretical result 1.00 · evidence from proof or derivation 0.94.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v1
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper
Original abstract

In this work, we calculate the sub-leading power contributions to the radiative leptonic $D\to\gamma \,\ell \,\nu$ decay. For the first time, we provide the analytic expressions of next-to-leading power contributions and the error estimation associated with the power expansion of ${\cal O}(\Lambda_{\rm QCD}/m_c)$. In our calculation, we adopt two different models of the $D$-meson distribution amplitudes $\phi_{D,\rm I}^+$ and $\phi_{D,\rm II}^+$. Within the framework of the QCD factorization as well as the dispersion relation, we evaluate the soft contribution up to the next-to-leading logarithmic accuracy, and the higher-twist contribution from the two-particle and three-particle distribution amplitudes is also considered. Finally, we find that all the sub-leading power contributions are significant at $\lambda_D(\mu_0)=354\,\rm MeV$, and the next-to-leading power contributions will lead to $143\%$ in $\phi_{D,\rm I}^+$ and $120\%$ in $\phi_{D,\rm II}^+$ corrections to leading power vector form factors with $E_{\gamma}=0.5\,\rm GeV$. As the corrections from the higher-twist and local sub-leading power contributions will be enhanced with the growing of the inverse moment, it is difficult to extract an appropriate inverse moment of the $D$-meson distribution amplitude. The predicted branching fractions are $(1.88_{-0.29}^{+0.36})\times10^{-5}$ for $\phi_{D,\rm I}^+$ and $(2.31_{-0.54}^{+0.65})\times10^{-5}$ for $\phi_{D,\rm II}^+$, respectively.

Human review
How the literature uses it

4 arXiv papers cite this in 4 sentences

Each citing sentence is taken from the citing paper's LaTeX source and typed by Pith's classifier. A label appears at probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), a contest at 0.7 or more; the quoted words are the citing authors'. How each label was checked · JSON

Papers citing it · 2 sentences without a confident label

Cites it as background 2 papers

What it cites · 10 sentences without a confident label

Builds on 1 paper
  • The local sub-leading power contribution in this procedure is given by evaluating the second diagram and the local term of the first diagram in figure [ref], which is the same as [ref] by just changing bottom quark to charm quark according to the symmetry of heavy quarks [equation] where the first term and second term correspond to the photon emission from the down quark and charm quark, respectively.

    B meson distribution amplitude from B --> \gamma l \nu · The local sub-leading power contribution and higher-twist contribution · 0.93

Uses the method or tool of 6 papers
Uses data or values from 2 papers
Compares with 3 papers
Cites as background 12 papers
  • In the heavy quark limit, both the $B$- and $D$-meson decays could be studied within the factorization approach, the leading power (LP) predictions of $D→e ν_e γ$ are presented in [ref] , where the final state photon can be either hard or soft.

    Factorization of Radiative Leptonic Decays of $B^-$ and $D^-$ Mesons Including the Soft Photon Region · Introduction · 0.96

  • In the heavy quark limit, both the $B$- and $D$-meson decays could be studied within the factorization approach, the leading power (LP) predictions of $D→e ν_e γ$ are presented in [ref] , where the final state photon can be either hard or soft.

    Factorization of Radiative Leptonic Decays of $B^-$ and $D^-$ Mesons · Introduction · 0.96

  • In the framework of QCDF, one can separate long-distance and short-distance contributions via a simultaneous expansion in the power of strong coupling constant and $Λ_QCD/m_Q$, and the factorization approach has been applied to various radiative heavy meson decays [ref] , and other processes such as factorization of the correlation function in light-cone sum rules [ref] .

    Perturbative corrections to $B \to D$ form factors in QCD · Introduction · 0.81

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.