Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Semantically Stealthy Adversarial Attacks against Segmentation Models

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2104.01732 v3 pith:IM4UFF4Q submitted 2021-04-05 cs.CV

Semantically Stealthy Adversarial Attacks against Segmentation Models

classification cs.CV
keywords modelsadversariallabelssegmentationattackattacksnon-targetedsemantically
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

Segmentation models have been found to be vulnerable to targeted and non-targeted adversarial attacks. However, the resulting segmentation outputs are often so damaged that it is easy to spot an attack. In this paper, we propose semantically stealthy adversarial attacks which can manipulate targeted labels while preserving non-targeted labels at the same time. One challenge is making semantically meaningful manipulations across datasets and models. Another challenge is avoiding damaging non-targeted labels. To solve these challenges, we consider each input image as prior knowledge to generate perturbations. We also design a special regularizer to help extract features. To evaluate our model's performance, we design three basic attack types, namely `vanishing into the context,' `embedding fake labels,' and `displacing target objects.' Our experiments show that our stealthy adversarial model can attack segmentation models with a relatively high success rate on Cityscapes, Mapillary, and BDD100K. Our framework shows good empirical generalization across datasets and models.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.