Pith. Sign in

RECORD

LI-Net: Large-Pose Identity-Preserving Face Reenactment Network

Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition · Submitted 7 Apr 2021

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim Both qualitative and quantitative experimental results demonstrate the superiority of our method.

how it is stated · asserted 1.00 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv ID2104.02850 (version 1)
Pith ID3NQKMNPD, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationCai Yu, Jiao Dai, Jin Liu, Jizhong Han, Peng Chen, Shuqiao Zou, Tao Liang, Zhaoxing Li. "LI-Net: Large-Pose Identity-Preserving Face Reenactment Network." arXiv:2104.02850 (2021). https://pith.science/paper/3NQKMNPD
Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13.0 via TypeSafe API, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 5,565 input tokens.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.04 · states limitation 0.06 · human participants 0.14 · controlled comparison 0.23 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.05 · compares with prior results 0.61 · mentions code or data availability 0.02.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v1. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

Face reenactment is a challenging task, as it is difficult to maintain accurate expression, pose and identity simultaneously. Most existing methods directly apply driving facial landmarks to reenact source faces and ignore the intrinsic gap between two identities, resulting in the identity mismatch issue. Besides, they neglect the entanglement of expression and pose features when encoding driving faces, leading to inaccurate expressions and visual artifacts on large-pose reenacted faces. To address these problems, we propose a Large-pose Identity-preserving face reenactment network, LI-Net. Specifically, the Landmark Transformer is adopted to adjust driving landmark images, which aims to narrow the identity gap between driving and source landmark images. Then the Face Rotation Module and the Expression Enhancing Generator decouple the transformed landmark image into pose and expression features, and reenact those attributes separately to generate identity-preserving faces with accurate expressions and poses. Both qualitative and quantitative experimental results demonstrate the superiority of our method.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 Face reenactment is a challenging task, as it is difficult to maintain accurate expression, pose and identity simultaneously. background 1.00 0.07 0.03 asserted 1.00
s1 Most existing methods directly apply driving facial landmarks to reenact source faces and ignore the intrinsic gap between two identities, resulting in the identity mismatch issue. background 0.73 0.04 0.03 asserted 1.00
s2 Besides, they neglect the entanglement of expression and pose features when encoding driving faces, leading to inaccurate expressions and visual artifacts on large-pose reenacted faces. background 0.82 0.05 0.02 asserted 1.00
s3 To address these problems, we propose a Large-pose Identity-preserving face reenactment network, LI-Net. contribution 1.00 0.82 0.09 asserted 0.95
s4 Specifically, the Landmark Transformer is adopted to adjust driving landmark images, which aims to narrow the identity gap between driving and source landmark images. method 0.98 0.83 0.04 asserted 0.97
s5 Then the Face Rotation Module and the Expression Enhancing Generator decouple the transformed landmark image into pose and expression features, and reenact those attributes separately to generate identity-preserving faces with accurate expressions and poses. method 0.99 0.87 0.09 asserted 0.99
s6 Both qualitative and quantitative experimental results demonstrate the superiority of our method. result 0.96 0.93 0.81 asserted 1.00

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: method or tool 1.00 · evidence from observation or experiment 0.99.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v1
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper
Original abstract

Face reenactment is a challenging task, as it is difficult to maintain accurate expression, pose and identity simultaneously. Most existing methods directly apply driving facial landmarks to reenact source faces and ignore the intrinsic gap between two identities, resulting in the identity mismatch issue. Besides, they neglect the entanglement of expression and pose features when encoding driving faces, leading to inaccurate expressions and visual artifacts on large-pose reenacted faces. To address these problems, we propose a Large-pose Identity-preserving face reenactment network, LI-Net. Specifically, the Landmark Transformer is adopted to adjust driving landmark images, which aims to narrow the identity gap between driving and source landmark images. Then the Face Rotation Module and the Expression Enhancing Generator decouple the transformed landmark image into pose and expression features, and reenact those attributes separately to generate identity-preserving faces with accurate expressions and poses. Both qualitative and quantitative experimental results demonstrate the superiority of our method.

Human review
How the literature uses it

What this paper does with the arXiv papers it cites

Each citing sentence is taken from the citing paper's LaTeX source and typed by Pith's classifier. A label appears at probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), a contest at 0.7 or more; the quoted words are the citing authors'. How each label was checked · JSON

What it cites

Uses the method or tool of 2 papers
Cites as background 1 paper
  • Diverse methods related to GAN [ref] are proposed to achieve facial attribute editing or whole face image generation. cGAN [ref] controls the attribute of faces using condition information vectors.

    Conditional Generative Adversarial Nets · Related work · 1.00

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.